Robin Hoods in Wakefield Manor Court Rolls (record texts): Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
|||
Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
{{:1339 - Robert Hood of Alverthorpe (4)}} | {{:1339 - Robert Hood of Alverthorpe (4)}} | ||
=== Robert Hode jr. of Alverthorpe === | === Robert Hode jr. of Alverthorpe === | ||
Since the above Robert | Since the above Robert Hode of Alverthorpe figures already in 1307, it is quite likely that it was his son rather than he himself who was the Robert Hode junior whose son John figures in 1340. It is not clear whether John son of Robert Hode, also figuring the latter year, is identical with John son of Robert Hode junior or if he was a son of the older Robert Hode. | ||
====[[1340 - John son of Robert Hode junior]] ==== | ====[[1340 - John son of Robert Hode junior]] ==== | ||
{{:1340 - John son of Robert Hode junior}} | {{:1340 - John son of Robert Hode junior}} | ||
====[[1340 - John son of Robert Hode]] ==== | ====[[1340 - John son of Robert Hode]] ==== | ||
{{:1340 - John son of Robert Hode}} | {{:1340 - John son of Robert Hode}} | ||
=== No vill mentioned === | === No vill mentioned === | ||
==== [[1324 - Robert Hood (Wakefield Manor)]] ==== | ==== [[1324 - Robert Hood (Wakefield Manor)]] ==== |
Revision as of 21:54, 8 August 2020
![](/w/images/thumb/1/15/Manor_of_wakefield_map.jpg/500px-Manor_of_wakefield_map.jpg)
By Henrik Thiil Nielsen, 2015-07-11. Revised by Henrik Thiil Nielsen, 2020-08-08.
The Manor of Wakefield was a vast estate covering two large areas of the West Riding of Yorkshire. In addition to Wakefield, townships within the manor include Stansfield, Heptonstall, Northowram, Hipperholme, Brighouse, Clifton, Hartshead, Dewsbury, Ossett, Sandal, Walton, Holme, Shepley, etc. (see map of the estate). An almost unbroken series of records of the manorial court exists from 1274 to 1925, when the manor was dissolved.[1] During the first third of the 14th century, families surnamed Hood with at least one member carrying the first name Robert were found in Wakefield, Alverthorpe, Stanley, and Sowerby (see Google map). Joseph Hunter famously suggested that one of these Robert Hoods, a Wakefield tenant who appears in the manor court rolls during the first quarter of the 14th century, was the historical original of the traditional character.[2] For this reason, and also because the other R. Hoods in the court rolls are of interest, we must take a close look at the Robert Hoods mentioned in the court rolls (links to relevant records are found below). This will involve also an attempt to establish as much as possible of their ancestry.
Robert Hoods in Wakefield manor court rolls
It is hoped that eventually all court roll entries relating to men named Robert Hood occurring before 1500 will be entered.
103 records of Robert Hoods in the medieval court rolls of the manor of Wakefield (record entries are cited below):
- 1307 - Robert Hod of Alverthorpe
- 1308 - Robert Hod of Alverthorpe
- 1308 - Robert Hodde of Alverthorpe
- 1308 - Robert Hodde of Wakefield
- 1308 - Robert Hode of Newton (Alverthorpe)
- 1308 - Robert son of John Hodde of Sowerby
- 1309 - Robert Hod of Wakefield (1)
- 1309 - Robert Hod of Wakefield (2)
- 1309 - Robert Hod of Wakefield (3)
- 1309 - Robert Hode of Alverthorpe (1)
- 1309 - Robert Hode of Alverthorpe (2)
- 1313 - Robert Hodde and Robert Hood of Wakefield
- 1313 - Robert son of John Hodde of Sowerby injured
- 1314 - Robert Hodd of Wakefield
- 1314 - Robert Hodde of Wakefield
- 1314 - Robert son of John Hodde of Sowerby (1)
- 1314 - Robert son of John Hodde of Sowerby (2)
- 1315 - Robert and Robert sons of John Hood
- 1315 - Robert Hodde of Wakefield (1)
- 1315 - Robert Hodde of Wakefield (2)
- 1315 - Robert Hoode of Stanley
- 1316 - John son of Robert Hode of Sowerby
- 1316 - Robert and Matilda Hade of Wakefield
- 1316 - Robert and Matilda Hood of Wakefield
- 1316 - Robert and Robert sons of John Hood
- 1316 - Robert Hod of Wakefield
- 1316 - Robert Hodde of Wakefield
- 1316 - Robert Hood of Alverthorpe (1)
- 1316 - Robert Hood of Alverthorpe (2)
- 1316 - Robert Hood of Alverthorpe (3)
- 1316 - Robert Hood of Alverthorpe (4)
- 1316 - Robert Hood of Newton
- 1316 - Robert Hoode
- 1317 - Robert Hood of Alverthorpe
- 1317 - Robert Hood of Newton (1)
- 1317 - Robert Hood of Newton (2)
- 1317 - Robert Hood of Newton (3)
- 1323 - Robert Hood of Alverthorpe (1)
- 1323 - Robert Hood of Alverthorpe (2)
- 1323 - Robert Hood of Newton (1)
- 1323 - Robert Hood of Newton (2)
- 1323 - Robert Hood of Newton (3)
- 1323 - Robert Hood of Newton (4)
- 1324 - Robert Hood (Wakefield Manor)
- 1324 - Robert Hood of Alverthorpe (1)
- 1324 - Robert Hood of Newton (1)
- 1324 - Robert Hood of Newton (2)
- 1324 - Robert Hood of Newton (3)
- 1325 - Robert Hood of Newton (1)
- 1325 - Robert Hood of Newton (2)
- 1329 - Robert Hood of Newton
- 1331 - Robert Hodde of Sowerby
- 1331 - Robert Hode of Wakefield
- 1331 - Robert Hood of Newton (01)
- 1331 - Robert Hood of Newton (02)
- 1331 - Robert Hood of Newton (03)
- 1331 - Robert Hood of Newton (04)
- 1331 - Robert Hood of Newton (05)
- 1331 - Robert Hood of Newton (06)
- 1331 - Robert Hood of Newton (07)
- 1331 - Robert Hood of Newton (08)
- 1331 - Robert Hood of Newton (09)
- 1331 - Robert Hood of Newton (10)
- 1331 - Robert Hood of Newton (11)
- 1331 - Robert Hood of Newton (12)
- 1331 - Robert Hood of Wakefield
- 1332 - Robert Hode of Stanley (1)
- 1332 - Robert Hode of Stanley (2)
- 1332 - Robert Hode of Stanley (3)
- 1332 - Robert Hood of Newton
- 1333 - Baker Robert Hood (Wakefield Manor)
- 1333 - Robert Hode of Sowerby
- 1333 - Robert Hood of Alverthorpe (1)
- 1333 - Robert Hood of Newton (1)
- 1333 - Robert Hood of Newton (2)
- 1333 - Robert Hood of Newton (3)
- 1333 - Robert Hood of Newton (4)
- 1333 - Robert Hood of Newton (5)
- 1338 - Robert Hood of Alverthorpe (1)
- 1338 - Robert Hood of Alverthorpe (2)
- 1338 - Robert Hood of Alverthorpe (3)
- 1338 - Robert Hood of Alverthorpe (4)
- 1338 - Robert Hood of Newton (1)
- 1338 - Robert Hood of Newton (2)
- 1338 - Robert Hood of Newton (3)
- 1339 - Robert Hode junior of Sowerby
- 1339 - Robert Hood of Alverthorpe (1)
- 1339 - Robert Hood of Alverthorpe (2)
- 1339 - Robert Hood of Alverthorpe (3)
- 1339 - Robert Hood of Alverthorpe (4)
- 1339 - Robert Hood of Newton
- 1340 - John son of Robert Hode
- 1340 - John son of Robert Hode junior
- 1340 - Robert Hood of Newton (1)
- 1340 - Robert Hood of Newton (2)
- 1340 - Robert Hood of Newton (3)
- 1340 - Robert Hood of Newton (4)
- 1340 - Robert Hood of Newton (5)
- 1340 - Robert Hood of Newton (6)
- 1340 - Robert Hood of Newton (7)
- 1340 - Robert Hood of Newton (8)
- 1340 - Robert Hood of Newton (9)
- 1350 - Robert son of Peter Hode
The Hoods of Alverthorpe
The court rolls examined so far include at least 15 entries relating to a Robert Hood under the heading 'Alverthorpe' (or similar). The most parsimonius assumption is that they all refer to one and the same man, and there seems to be no evidence against this. The same can be said for the records referring to Robert Hood of Newton (see below). The 1309 entry shows that Robert Hood of Alverthorpe was then a grave, an administrative official elected by the township. Taken together, entries dating from the 1320s relating to Robert Hood of Alverthorpe and his namesake of Newton make it all but certain that the two were one and the same person holding land in both vills. Evidently this Robert Hood was originally from Newton but resident in Alverthorpe. Entries in which 'of Newton' is appended to his name are found in the section following the present. Entries which cannot be connected with a specific vill appear last as a subsection under the present section.
The following 22 to 24 records refer to Robert Hood of Alverthorpe:
1307 - Robert Hod of Alverthorpe
[1307:]
Adam Gerbot sues Alice da. of Alice for an acre of land, which he claims because Gerbot, his father, bought the land and took it in open Court, and never surrendered it. Alice says that Gerbot, [? his or her] father, bought the land to her use with her own goods. An attaint is taken by 24, viz.:—Philip de Mora, Robert de Lupesheved, William s. of Thomas, John Malyn, Thomas Lyleman, Richard Pegere, Richard s. of Broun, Robert Hod, Richard Bunny, Henry del Bothom, Walter del Hill, Robert Pille, Philip le Syur, Richard del Bothom, John Bullok, Robert Gunne, Walter Bateman, William Albray, Simon de Monte, John de Chykenley, Adam del Dene, William Child, John s. of Eva, and Adam de Chykenley, who find that Gerbot de Alverthorpe bought the land with Alice's chattels and for her use. She may hold in peace. Adam is fined 4d.[3]
1308 - Robert Hod of Alverthorpe
[1308:]
John Leche and Robert Hod, 12d. each, for making their haystack [pro faciendo fenile suum] in the common way[4]
1308 - Robert Hode of Newton (Alverthorpe)
[1308:]
Robert Hode of Neuton, 2d. [...] for dry wood.[5]
1308 - Robert Hodde of Alverthorpe
[1308:]
Robert Hodde drew blood from the wife of Henry Archur; 12d. And from Juliana Horsse; 12d.[6]
1309 - Robert Hode of Alverthorpe (1)
[1309:]
Richard s. of Broun v. Adam Gerbot, Richard de Colley, William Hoskel, and Richard Wythundes, for trespass. Pledge, Robert Hode.[7]
1309 - Robert Hode of Alverthorpe (2)
[1309:]
Robert Hode the Grave, for breaking the Earl's fold, 12d.[8]
1316 - Robert Hood of Alverthorpe (1)
Amabel Brodeye sues Robert Hood on a plea of debt. Pledge of prosecution, Thomas of Wyttlay, & the aforesaid Amabel puts in her place John atte Bar.[9]
1316 - Robert Hood of Alverthorpe (2)
Amabel Brodelegh sues Robert Hood for 7s issuing from a rood of land which the said Robert demised to the same Amabel for the term of six years which he was not able to warrant to her. The aforesaid Robert came & could not deny this. Therefore, it is decided that the said Amabel may recover the said 7s, & the said Robert for his unjust deceit be amerced 3d.[10]
1316 - Robert Hood of Alverthorpe (3)
1316 - Robert Hood of Alverthorpe (4)
1317 - Robert Hood of Alverthorpe
Robert Hood gives 2s, to take ½ acre of meadow in Alvirthorp field from Walter of the Hill, in fee.[13]
1323 - Robert Hood of Alverthorpe (1)
Robert Hode surrenders 3 roods in Alverthorp; committed to Robert de Fetherston; entry, 6d.[14]
1323 - Robert Hood of Alverthorpe (2)
1324 - Robert Hood of Alverthorpe (1)
John Attebarre sues Robert Hood for trespass. Surety—German Kay. He is attached by William de Ouchethorp.[16]
1333 - Robert Hood of Alverthorpe (1)
An inquisition of 12 jurors, that is Robert Hode, William de Ouchethorp, Robert Malyn, William de Birkenshagh, John Swan, John Isbell, Robert Peger, William son of Philip de Mora, Richard de Luppesheved, William son of Thomas de Thornes, William [p. 174:] Attetounend and Robert Lepar, finds by assent of the parties who say on oath that (Geoffrey de Birkenshagh) is not deforcing the plaintiff from the meadowland. Therefore he is to take nothing by his suit and is amerced 6d for false claim.[17]
1338 - Robert Hood of Alverthorpe (1)
Robert Hode plaintiff offers himself against Walter le Wright in a plea of trespass. Walter does not come and is amerced 2d; order is given to distrain him.[18]
1338 - Robert Hood of Alverthorpe (2)
Likewise [i.e. a day is given until the next court] to Robert Hode plaintiff and Walter le Wright in a plea of trespass.[19]
1338 - Robert Hood of Alverthorpe (3)
Walter Wright acknowledges that he owes 3d to Robert Hode. He is to satisfy and is amerced 2d.[20]
1338 - Robert Hood of Alverthorpe (4)
Richard Swan acknowledges that he owes Robert Hode 4s 6d. He is to satisfy and is amerced 3d.[21]
1339 - Robert Hood of Alverthorpe (1)
Robert Hode likewise [surrenders in court] a rood of land of meadow in Alvirthorp, which [is] granted to William de Feri to hold to himself and his heirs following the custom of the manor; fine 3d.[22]
1339 - Robert Hood of Alverthorpe (2)
Robert Hode is amerced 3d for false claim against Richard Swan in a plea of debt. The jurors say that Robert Hode owes 14½d to Richard Swan. He is to satisfy and is amerced 3d. The same jurors say that Robert Hode broke an agreement with Richard Swan, damage 6d. Likewise 3d. Likewise that Robert Hode broke an agreement with Richard Swan concerning the hire of an ox, damage 3d. Likewise 3d.[23]
1339 - Robert Hood of Alverthorpe (3)
A day is given until the next court to Richard Wythundes plaintiff and Robert Hode in a like plea [i.e. a plea of debt].[24]
1339 - Robert Hood of Alverthorpe (4)
Robert Hode acknowledges that he owes Richard Wythundes 12d. He is to satisfy and is amerced 2d. [25]
Robert Hode jr. of Alverthorpe
Since the above Robert Hode of Alverthorpe figures already in 1307, it is quite likely that it was his son rather than he himself who was the Robert Hode junior whose son John figures in 1340. It is not clear whether John son of Robert Hode, also figuring the latter year, is identical with John son of Robert Hode junior or if he was a son of the older Robert Hode.
1340 - John son of Robert Hode junior
John son of Robert Hode junior likewise [i.e. drew blood] from William son of Richard de Batelay, 6d.[26]
1340 - John son of Robert Hode
Henry de Stannelay comes into court and acknowledges that he owes John Jose 23d as pledge for John son of Robert Hode for a tunic bought from him. He is to satisfy for the 23d, and 40d damages, and is not taxed because he does not wish to find a pledge. He is amerced 2d.[27]
No vill mentioned
1324 - Robert Hood (Wakefield Manor)
William de Ouchethorp acknowledges he owes John Sibbeson the crop of a rood of land sown with oats. Surety—Robert Hood.[28]
1333 - Baker Robert Hood (Wakefield Manor)
For dry wood: William son of Magot, Robert Arthur, Henry Tropinell, William Hodelyn, John son of John Pollard, William Twentipair, William Thrift, Robert Hode baker, Joan de Langeley, Matilda Mous, 3d each.[29]
Robert Hood of Newton
At least 35 records concern a Robert Hood of Newton. There is no evidence to show that they do not all refer to one and the same man. Records mentioning Robert Hoods of Alverthorpe or Newton during the 1320s make it almost certain that we are concerned with one person holding land in both vills. See further above.
1316 - Robert Hood of Newton
1317 - Robert Hood of Newton (1)
Orders to take Robert Cay of Neuton, for stealing 3 pieces of iron, worth 6d, and a 'wyndyngcloth', worth 2½d, from the cart of Robert Hood of Neuton.[31]
1317 - Robert Hood of Newton (2)
Payments for dry wood, and breaking down hedges, etc.:
Stanneley. John, son of Philip, Symon Tyting, Robert Gunne, Roger the Tailor of Lofthous [John Bateman, his pledge], Robert Hood of Neuton, Robert Alayn, Robert Campion, 3d each; Gilbert the Theker, Mariota Bullok and her companion [socia], John Hancock, Thomas Bunny, Robert, son of Emma, Robert Hode and Nicholas of Lofthous, 2d each.[32]
1317 - Robert Hood of Newton (3)
Robert Hood of Neuton gives 6s 8d for leave to dig coal on the common in a pit taken long since [de antiquo capto].[33]
1323 - Robert Hood of Newton (1)
Robert Hode of Neuton surrenders half a "broddole" in the great meadow of Alverthorp, which is committed to Philip D . . . 6d for entry.[34]
1323 - Robert Hood of Newton (2)
1323 - Robert Hood of Newton (3)
1323 - Robert Hood of Newton (4)
Nicholas de Bateley sues the said Robert [i.e. Robert Hode of Neuton] for taking a horse. Surety—Thomas Bille.[37]
1324 - Robert Hood of Newton (1)
1324 - Robert Hood of Newton (2)
1324 - Robert Hood of Newton (3)
1325 - Robert Hood of Newton (1)
1325 - Robert Hood of Newton (2)
William de Castilford sues Robert Hode of Neuton for debt for 6s, which is acknowledged; Robert fined 4d.[42]
1329 - Robert Hood of Newton
The imparlance between Robert Hood of Neutone, & John Swan, for debt, respited till the tourn.[43]
1331 - Robert Hood of Newton (01)
Order is given [...] to distrain John le Couper and Thomas de Chatburn to answer Robert Hood of Newton in a plea of unjustly taking and detaining a horse [...][44]
1331 - Robert Hood of Newton (02)
Order is given [...] to attach Robert Hood of Newton to answer John le Couper and to Thomas de Chatburn in pleas of trespass [...][45]
1331 - Robert Hood of Newton (03)
Robert Hood of Newton plaintiff and John Couper compromise in a plea of unjust taking and detention of a horse; Robert is amerced 3d.[46]
1331 - Robert Hood of Newton (04)
Thomas de Chatteburn defendant essoins for the second time by Robert de Mora against Robert Hoode of Newton in a plea of [p. 11;] taking and detaining a horse; pledge, William de Lockewode. And because Robert offers himself, therefore etc.[47]
1331 - Robert Hood of Newton (05)
John Couper plaintiff and Robert Hood of Newton compromise by licence of the court in a plea of trespass; Robert is amerced 3d.[48]
1331 - Robert Hood of Newton (06)
John Couper plaintiff and Robert Hood of Newton compromise by licence of the court in a plea of trespass; Robert is amerced 3d.[49]
1331 - Robert Hood of Newton (07)
1331 - Robert Hood of Newton (08)
Order is given [...] to attach Robert Hood to answer Thomas de Chatburne in a plea of trespass.[51]
1331 - Robert Hood of Newton (09)
An inquisition is to come to the next court to determine if John le Couper wrongfully took and detained a certain horse belonging to Robert Hood of Newton.[52]
1331 - Robert Hood of Newton (10)
Thomas de Chatburn defendant essoins for the first time by John de Gairgrave against Robert Hoode of Newton in a plea of taking and detaining a horse; pledge, William de Lockewod. And because Robert offers himself, therefore etc.[53]
1331 - Robert Hood of Newton (11)
An inquisition is to come to the next court between John Couper plaintiff and Robert Hood to determine if the aforesaid Robert trampled and depastured with cattle John's corn and rye in the field of Newton or not.[54]
1331 - Robert Hood of Newton (12)
Thomas de Chatburn plaintiff does not prosecute against Robert Hood in a plea of trespass, therefore he and his pledges are amerced 4d, and Robert is quit.[55]
1332 - Robert Hood of Newton (1)
1332 - Robert Hood of Newton (1)
1333 - Robert Hood of Newton (1)
Robert Hode of Newton, William de Ouchethorp, and Thomas Bunny, summoned in a certain inquisition, do not come, therefore are amerced 3d each.[56]
1333 - Robert Hood of Newton (2)
William Templer sues Robert Hode (in mercy) of Newton in a plea of trespass; pledge, Robert de Mora.[57]
1333 - Robert Hood of Newton (3)
William Templer sues Robert Hode in a plea of trespass. He says that Robert's cattle trampled his corn to his damage 40d. Robert says he is not guilty; therefore inquisition.[58]
1333 - Robert Hood of Newton (4)
Order given for an inquisition to come to the present court in a plea of trespass between William Templer complainant and Robert Hode res- [p. 201:] pited for want of jurors.[59]
1333 - Robert Hood of Newton (5)
William Templer plaintiff and Robert Hode compromise by licence in a plea of trespass; Robert is amerced 3d.[60]
1338 - Robert Hood of Newton (1)
Beatrice formerly wife of Richard de Colley seeks against Philip Damysel a third of a rood of meadow in Alvirthorp as her dower which fell to her after the death of Richard. Philip says that Robert Hode de Neuton surrendered the meadow in the lord's court to be held by service by himself and his heirs following the custom of the manor, and summons Robert to warrant concerning this.[61]
1338 - Robert Hood of Newton (2)
The suit in respite between Beatrice formerly wife of Richard de Colley petitioner and Robert Hode, holding by his warrant, in a plea of dower, as in the last court.[62]
1338 - Robert Hood of Newton (3)
Robert Hode was summoned to warrant Philip Damysel in a third of a rood of meadow in Alvirthorp which Beatrice formerly wife of Richard de Colley seeks against Philip as her dower. He is present in court to warrant it and can say nothing against her petition. Beatrice is to recover the land, and Philip is to recover its value from Robert. Robert is amerced 6d.[63]
1339 - Robert Hood of Newton
1340 - Robert Hood of Newton (1)
1340 - Robert Hood of Newton (2)
John de Welles was summoned to answer Robert de [p. 223:] Hyperum, Joanna his wife, Thomas de Lepton and Margery his wife in a plea that he deforced them of an acre and half a rood in Alvirthorp which they claim to be the right and inheritance of Joanna and Margery after the death of John Swerd their uncle, who died seised of it. John says that they can claim no right in the land because John Swerd, long before his death, surrendered the land into the hand of the grave for the benefit of the said John. And he took the land in court and <then> made fine with the lord, and he seeks an inquiry. The plaintiffs similarly. The jurors, namely Henry Brounsmith, Adam Rudde, Robert Malyn, John Gerbot, Richard Swan, Adam del Bothe, Robert Hode de Neuton, William de Ouchethorp, Robert Salman, John Attebarre, Richard Wythundes and Thomas Binny, say on their oath that John Swerd, long before his death, surrendered the said land into the hand of John Gerbot, then grave of Alvirthorp, who <to the benefit (opus) of John de Welles > offered the same land at the next court, in the court of John de Trehampton, then steward. The latter ordered him to retain the said land in his hand. After the death of John Swerd, John de Welles came into court in the presence of Sir Simon de Baldreston <then steward >, and took the said land and then made a fine. Asked if any surrendering land to the grave die before the surrender to use was made in court, should the heir have it automatically, the Jurors said that such land needed a new seizure and entry fine in court. Therefore John de Welles is to hold the land to himself and his heirs in perpetuity. The plaintiffs are amerced 2d for false claim; the amercement of Thomas de Lepton is pardoned because he is a clerk.[66]
1340 - Robert Hood of Newton (3)
1340 - Robert Hood of Newton (4)
Peter Attebarre has a day to wager his law that he did not depasture grass of John Attebarre in the meadow at Neuton to his damage. Robert Hode likewise. An inquiry is to come to determine whether or not Robert Hode depastured his grass in his croft at Neuton and also whether he depastured his grass and corn in le Estefeld.[68]
1340 - Robert Hood of Newton (5)
John Attebarre acknowledges that he depastured corn and grass of Thomas Roller with his beasts, damage taxed at [blank]. Likewise 2d. Likewise that he depastured half an acre of oats of Robert Hode with his beasts, damage taxed at [blank]. Likewise 2d.[69]
1340 - Robert Hood of Newton (6)
A day is given until the next court to John Attebarre plaintiff and Robert Hode in a plea of trespass in 2 claims.[70]
1340 - Robert Hood of Newton (7)
John Attebarre plaintiff and Robert Hode agree in a plea of trespass. Robert is amerced 2d.[71]
1340 - Robert Hood of Newton (8)
An inquiry is to come to determine whether or not Robert Hode de Neuton mowed grass of John de Wright and carried off his hay from a third of a dole of meadow in Alvirthorp which he leased from the wife of Richard de Colley.[72]
1340 - Robert Hood of Newton (9)
The jurors say that Robert Hode depastured grass of John Wright, damage taxed at 2d. He is to satisfy and is amerced 3d. And the same inquiry finds that John Wright mowed grass of Robert Hoode, damage taxed at 14d. Likewise 3d.[73]
The Hoods of Sowerby
Ten court roll entries from the period 1308-39 are concerned with one or both of the sons of John Hood (or Hodde) who were named Robert or with a son of one of them also named Robert.
The following records refer to the Hoods of Sourby:
1308 - Robert son of John Hodde of Sowerby
[1308:]
Robert, s. of John Hodde gives 2s. 3 d for 4 acres1 in Blacwode; rent 2s.[74]
1313 - Robert son of John Hodde of Sowerby injured
[1313:]
Henry del Loue drew blood from Robert, s. of John Hodde; 12d.[75]
1314 - Robert son of John Hodde of Sowerby (1)
[1314]
Robert, s. of John Hodde, gives 2s. to take 2½ acres with buildings in Soureby of John Pikeston, for 11 years.[76]
1314 - Robert son of John Hodde of Sowerby (2)
[1314:]
Elias, s. of Ivo de Warlolay, 18d. to take 3 acres in Sourby, on Wildeborhill, from Robert, s. of John Hodde.[77]
1315 - Robert and Robert sons of John Hood
[1315:]
Robert, s. of John Hodde, 6d.; Robert, his brother, 3d. [...] for escapes in the Frith.[78]
[1316:]
It is found [attinctum] by an Inquisition of the jurors that John of Miggeley by a certain false suggestion which he laid against Robert & Robert [sic] sons of John Hodde unjustly & maliciously recovered against the aforesaid Robert & Robert 10s by a plea in conoscor. It is ordered, therefore, that the aforesaid Robert & Robert recover the aforesaid 10s against the aforesaid John, & that he be amerced 6d, and the aforesaid Robert & Robert pay a fine of 5s for having aid to levy the aforesaid 10s from the aforesaid John.[79]
1316 - John son of Robert Hode of Sowerby
[1316:]
John son of Robert Hode gives 2s 4d for enclosing, & for arrears of rent, 1 rood & 10 falls of land enclosed 8 years ago, to hold to himself & his heirs, rendering therefor 2d per annum.[80]
1331 - Robert Hodde of Sowerby
Alice formerly wife of Henry de Migeley, demands against Robert Hodde of Sourby the third part of a messuage, of 10 acres of land & 1 acre of meadow in Sourby, by right of dower after the death of Henry, her late husband, of which the said Henry died seised, & in which Alice has nothing, she says. Robert says that one John de Migeley, father of the said Henry, died seised of the said tenements, & that Ellen, his wife, was dowered therein & survived the said Henry; wherefore Alice has no right to bring an action for a third of the same. And, as regards the remaining two thirds of the tenements, after the vesture thereof had been carried, he granted Alice her dower therein as was right. Alice says her husband was seised of the tenements at his death, & demands an inquisition. The inquisition finds he was never seised thereof, & therefore she cannot recover her dower on the whole. Her fine of 6d for false claim is forgiven by the Steward, & she is to recover her dower in ⅔ of the said tenements from Robert.[81]
1333 - Robert Hode of Sowerby
1339 - Robert Hode junior of Sowerby
Robert Hode junior surrenders into the hand of the grave half an acre in Sourby, which is granted to Hugh son of Otto to hold to himself and his heirs; fine 6d. [83]
Richard Hood of Sowerby
Eleven entries in the printed court rolls for the period 1275 to 1313 concern Richard Hood of Sowerby:
- 1274-11-22: Richard Hodde liable to a fine "for falsely and through hate presenting many trespasses against John de Miggeley and others, the Foresters of Sourby. [...] Respited until the Earl's coming." A Henry Urebrother to be "distrained for the like until he come to make satisfaction." Under heading: "Soureby".[84]
- 1275-02-02: "Henry Urebrother and Richard Hodde remain under surety, as at the last Court, to answer the Earl as to a false presentment made by them against the Foresters of Soureby, until the Earl's coming." Under heading: "Soureby".[85]
- 1275-02-02: Richard Hodde fined "for taking a heifer, which he says is his, out of the Earl's custody in the forest of Soureby". Under heading: "Soureby".[86]
- 1275-05-23: Richard Hood and Henry Urebrother are fined for their false presentment. Under heading: "Sourby".[87]
- 1275-07-13: "Henry Hourebrother and Richard Hodde complain of William and John de Noteschawe, Robert son of Roger, Richard de Estwode and Robert de Saltonstal, for trespass". Under heading: "Sourby".[88]
- 1275-08-15: Henry Hourebrother and Richard Hodde implicate the four men just mentioned in the production of the writing against the foresters of Sowerby. They allege that they, Richard Hood and Henry Urebrother, were essentially only messengers in presenting the said accusations, and as they were heavily fined for their actions they now want compensation from the four men named. An inquisition finds for the plaintiffs. Under heading: "Sourby".[89]
- 1285-01-13: Richard Hodde fined for taking six hazels; under heading: "Sourby".[90]
- 1285-04-25: Richard Hodde fined for "trespass in le Bekynges"; under heading: "Soureby".[91]
- 1286-09-08: Richard Hodde figures as pledge for Alice of Wyttcley, two of whose beasts have strayed.[92]
- 1297-05-11: Richard Hodde surrenders one acre of land to John the Miller; under heading: "Soureby".[93]
- 1313-10-06; court at Wakefield: Richard Hodde's suit of debt against Elias, son of Ivo, and Robert of Saltonstall respited until Halifax court turn.[94]
- 1313-10-18; court at Halifax: Richard Hodde sues Elias, son of Ivo, and Robert of Saltonstall for debt and does not prosecute the suit. His fine for this is pardoned because he is old and blind.[95]
An "inquisition touching the evildoers in the Forest of Soureby" was held on 22 November 1274. The members of the panel swore that John de Migeley, one of the earl's foresters, who was charged with poaching a stag, had done no such thing but was "in all things a good and true man towards the Earl and all others." He had been charged also with receiving four oxen and 16 sheep whih were the chattels of Hugh of Barkeshere, a fugitive. The jury said what actually happened was that the king's coroner claimed them for the king's use. They further swore to the innocence of Philip le Waleys and Alan del Rodes, who had been charged with taking a stag and a kid. The stag, they said, had been taken by an employee of Stephen le Waleys. All the foresters of "Souresbyschire", who had been charged with "very many offences in the Forest, such as hunting, vert, and allowing pigs in the Forest for moneys of which the Earl gets no part", were innocent and "in all things good and true men towards the Earl and all others, and keep their bailiwick well in all respects." Finally they stated that the said foresters were also innocent of "having taken 16s. to conceal complaints, fines and attachments". This had been "presented against them through the hate of their enemies."[96]
Of course we cannot entirely rule out the possibility that there were more than one Richard Hodde in Sowerby at the time, but the population of Sowerby stood at a mere 1,743 in 1881,[97] and the medieval village can hardly have had a very large population. All the entries relating to the allegedly false accusations against the foresters of Sowerby must concern a single Richard Hodde, and as some of these associate him with Henry Urebrother, we must assume that the Richard Hodde mentioned in another entry where the two figure together is the same person. Very likely all the above entries refer to one and the same Richard Hodde. He was the father of John Hodde.
John Hood of Sowerby (I)
At least six court roll entries under the heading of Sowerby refer to a John Hood. In three of them he is referred to as John, son of Richard Hodde:
- 1296-11-06; court at Halifax: John son of Richard Hodde successfully sues Adam son of Alice of Hipperholme for debt; Adam Migge is pledge; under heading: "Sourby".[98]
- 1296-11-06; court at Halifax: John son of Richard Hodde is a pledge; under heading: "Sourby".[99]
- 1296-11-06; court at Halifax: Similarly; under heading: "Sourby".[100]
- 1297-05-11: John Hodde successfully claims 40d. from Adam Migge; under heading: "Soureby".[101]
- 1297-06-24; court at Wakefield. John, son of Richard Hodde figures as a pledge; under heading: "Soureby".[102]
- 1297-07-07; court at Wakefield. John Hodde figures twice as a pledge; under heading: "Soureby".[103]
He may also well be the John Hood concerned in these two records:
We cannot entirely rule out the possibility that two or three John Hoods might be involved, but at least three of these entries – those referring to John, son of Richard Hood – can be fairly safely assumed to refer to one and the same man. It is very likely, therefore, that we can thus reconstruct a bit of the family tree of the two Sowerby Robin Hoods: their father was this John Hood whose father, in turn, was the above Richard Hood. It is possible, but does not seem likely, that some of the court roll entries listed under John Hood of Wakefield below do in fact refer to the Sowerby man of that name.
John Hood of Sowerby (II)
Unless there were three Robert Hoods in Sowerby at this time, one of the two Roberts just mentioned in turn had a son named John:
The Hoods of Stanley
The court rolls examined so far include four entries relating to Robert Hood(s) of Stanley.
1315 - Robert Hoode of Stanley
[1315:]
[...] Robert the Leeper, 6d. for leasing the said ½ acre for 6 years to Robert Hoode, who pays 12d.[104]
1332 - Robert Hode of Stanley (1)
The inquisition between Thomas Hydebier and John Tyting and Robert Hode in a plea as to why they impleaded him in court Chris- [p. 142:] tian respited.[105]
1332 - Robert Hode of Stanley (2)
The inquisition between Thomas Hydebier and John Titing and Robert Hode in a plea of impleading Thomas in court Christian respited.[106]
1332 - Robert Hode of Stanley (3)
An inquisition finds that Robert Hode (6d) and John Tyting (3d), executors of the testament of Matilda Tyting, impleaded Thomas Hydebyer in court Christian, therefore amerced 9d.[107]
Adam Hood of Stanley
- 1286-07-13; probably court at Wakefield. Adam Hod licensed "to take half a bovate of land in Stanley from Adam Balle".[108]
The Hoods of Wakefield
At least 14 court roll entries from the years 1313-31 are concerned with one or more Robert Hoods of Wakefield. In 1313 two persons are concerned, one just referred to as Robert Hodde, the other as "Robert Hodde of Wakefeud". This of course suggests that the first of them came from somewhere else than Wakefield, but I do not think we can be entirely certain of this.
Records mentioning the Wakefield Robin Hoods:
1308 - Robert Hodde of Wakefield
[1308:]
Robert Hodde, 2d. [...] for dry wood[109]
1309 - Robert Hod of Wakefield (1)
[1309:]
Robert Hod, 2d. [... p. 201: ...] for dry wood[110]
1309 - Robert Hod of Wakefield (2)
[1309:]
Robert Hod, 2d. [...] for dry wood[111]
1309 - Robert Hod of Wakefield (3)
[1309:]
Robert Hod, 2d.; for dry wood[112]
1313 - Robert Hodde and Robert Hood of Wakefield
[1313:]
Robert Hodde 6d.; Robert Hood of Wakefeud, 4d. [...] for vert, acorns, etc.[113]
1314 - Robert Hodd of Wakefield
[1314:]
Robert Hodd, 3d. [...] for dry wood.[114]
1314 - Robert Hodde of Wakefield
[1314:]
Robert Hodde, 3d. [...] for dry wood.[115]
1315 - Robert Hodde of Wakefield (1)
[1315:]
[...] John Torald, and Robert Hodde, 2d. each, for dry wood and escapes of swine.[116]
1315 - Robert Hodde of Wakefield (2)
[1315:]
[...] Robert Hodde, John Leche, [...] 2d. each for vert and dry wood.[117]
1316 - Robert Hod of Wakefield
[1316:]
[...] Robert Hod's handmaid, 2d. [...] for vert and dry wood.[118]
1316 - Robert Hodde of Wakefield
[1316:]
[...] the handmaids of Robert Hodde and Adam Halfmark, 2d. each, for dry wood.[119]
1316 - Robert and Matilda Hade of Wakefield
[1316:]
Robert Hade & Matilda his wife give 2s for leave to take one piece of the lord's waste on Bichill between the booths of Philip Damyson & Thomas Alayn of the length of 30 ft. [?] & breadth of 16 ft. to hold to the aforesaid Robert & Matilda & their heirs, rendering therefor yearly 6d at the three terms of the year.[120]
1316 - Robert and Matilda Hood of Wakefield
[1316:]
Robert Hood & Matilda his wife give 12d for leave to take 1 piece of curtilage in Wrengate, near the curtilage of Robert Clement from John Pollard to hold to himself & his heirs doing the services thereon.[121]
1316 - Robert Hoode
Hugh Fox vacat, because he left for Ireland, before they were called up, Thomas of Norton [3d], William Badger, William Rycharde, Thomas son of Rose [3d], John son of Geppe [3d], Robert son of John Roller [vacat, because he cannot be found], Thomas of Louthe [3d], John Don, John Tope, Robert Harward [3d] and Robert Hoode.[122]
1331 - Robert Hode of Wakefield
For not coming to the tourn: Thomas Pang, Elias de Craven, William Twenty pyre, 3d each, Augustine Pelliparius, John le Rastrik, Thomas son of Richard Clericus, John Dent, Ralph de Stansfeld, Thomas Molle, William Thrift, Thomas Malot, Robert Capon, Richard de Waterton, Richard son of Adam Peed, 2d each, Robert Nodger, 3d, William Broun, John son of Richard son of Henry, John son of Robert, John Tyde, Robert son of Ralph, John Kyd, Michael Carpenter, Hugh Fox, John Wilcok, Robert Gelleson, John son of Hugh, William Mariet, John Broun, John Haget, Robert Ciser of Lancashire, William Richaud senior, 2d each, John le Tumour, Henry Bui, 3d each, Henry le Teuwer, Robert Hoppay, Robert Hode, John Dade, Geoffrey de Bradforth, Simon le Tournour, 2d each, John son of Walter Pollard, John Harilull senior, 3d each, John son of Robert Carpentarius, Robert Herward, John Pollard, John son of Agnes, William le Glover, William Atteelme, Robert Dipsy, William Jose, John Rose, Walter le Stedman, Thomas de Louthe, John Tup, 2d each, John son of Walter Crocus, 3d, John Marjori, 2d.[123]
1331 - Robert Hood of Wakefield
For dry wood: the daughter of William Thecker, the handmaid of John de Langley, Beatrice Bul, Robert Hood, Henry de Tropinel, 2d each, Robert de Hoppay, 3d, Robert Besk, 3d, William Magotson, 2d.[124]
The published court rolls I have examined so far do not reveal the ancestry of the Wakefield Robert Hood or, for that matter, that of his 1313 namesake of unknown abode. However, three other Hoods living in Wakefield are found in the court rolls, each of whom could be the father of the Wakefield Robert Hood.
Adam Hood of Wakefield
An Adam Hod appears in the court rolls from 1274 to 1314. He seems to have been a Wakefield man, but there is no indication of how he was related to the other Wakefield Hoods.
- 1274-11-22; court at Wakefield. Adam Hod and 23 others, including Henry Hod, swear that they know nothing about the goods and chattels of John the Forester of Sowerby, who was killed. They do not know who has them, what has been done with them or who distributed them; under heading: "Wakefeud".[125]
- 1277-06-11; court at Wakefield. Adam Hod acts as a pledge.[126]
- 1277-08-15; court at Wakefield. Similarly.[127]
- 1285-01-13; court at Wakefield. Similarly.[128]
- 1285-01-13; probably court at Wakefield. Adam Hod twice acts as a pledge.[129]
- 1296-10-28; probably court at Wakefield. Adam Hod acts as a pledge.[130]
- 1296-11-16; court at Wakefield. Adam Hod on jury that acquits Richard, son of Hugh de Schipeden, who had been indicted at the Tourn at Rastrik for stealing 8 sheep".[131]
- 1297-02-15; court at Wakefield. Adam Hod acts as a pledge; under heading: "Essoins".[132]
- 1297, Friday in the first week of Lent; court at Wakefield. Adam Hod on a jury that acquits a woman of stealing a hood; under heading: "Ossete".[133]
- 1297-03-25; court at Wakefield. Adam Hod twice acts as a pledge; under heading: "Essoigns".[134]
- 1297, Friday in Easter week; court at Wakefield. Adam Hod acts as a pledge; under heading: "Essoigns".[135]
- 1297, Friday before Whitsuntide; court at Wakefield. Adam Hod twice acts as a pledge; under heading: "Essoigns".[136]
- 1297, Friday before Whitsuntide; court at Wakefield. Adam Hod on a jury that acquits two men of burglary; under heading: "Alvirthorpe".[137]
- 1314-01-13; court at Wakefield. Adam Hod acts as pledge; under heading: "Bailiff".[138]
- 1314, Friday in Whitsun week (16 June 1314); court at Wakefield. Adam Hod acts as surety; under heading: "Essoigns".[139]
- 1314-09-21; court at Wakefield. Adam Hod acts as surety; under heading: "Essoigns".[140]
Henry Hood of Wakefield
These three court roll entries relate to a Henry Hood of Wakefield. There is no indication of how he was related to the other Wakefield Hoods.
- 1274-10-18; court at Wakefield. Henry Hod and nine others charged with trespass but are quit as they "did suit at the Earl's mill." Under heading: "Wakefeud".[141]
- 1274-11-22; court at Wakefield. Henry Hod is a surety; under heading: "Wakefeud".[142]
- 1274-11-22; court at Wakefield. Henry Hod and 23 others, including Adam Hod, swear that they know nothing about the goods and chattels of John the Forester of Sowerby, who was killed. They do not know who has them, what has been done with them or who distributed them; under heading: "Wakefeud".[143]
John Hood of Wakefield (I)
A John Hood lived in Wakefield by 1313. He appears by the court roll entries listed below to have been a well-respected man who at times served on juries:
- 1313-10-12, court at Wakefield: John Hode is fined 12d. for blocking up "a pathway at the end of the town of Wakefeld, in Kergate, between Hesperode and chiterike".[144]
- 1316-02-25, court at Wakefield: John Hod is a member of a jury that acquits an accused thief. The thief was indicted at a tourn at Halifax. Judging by their names, jury members came from localities such as (South) Crossland, Osset and Stanley.[145]
- 1316-03-12, court at Wakefield; John Hod essoins.[146]
- Similarly on April 14 that year.[147]
- 1316, before 04-14, court at Wakefield; John Hood among a multitude fined for not coming to court.[148]
- 1316-04-14; court at Wakefield; John Hod essoins.[149]
- 1316; Friday in Whitsun week; court at Wakefield. John Hod is a member of a jury that sentences a thief to be hanged in the Whitsun week of that year. Judging from their names, the jury members are from Birstall, "Crosseland" (South Crossland), Ossett, Saltonstall, etc.[150]
- 1316-07-25; court at Wakefield. "John Hood of Wakefeld" sits on a jury that includes members with surnames such as Birstall and Crosseland.[151]
- 1316-08-05; court at Wakefield. John Hod stands surety for an essoin.[152]
- 1316-08-29; court at Wakefield. John Hod essoins.[153]
- 1322/23-03-12; court of the King, held at Wakefield. John Hode essoins by Thomas Thorald, Henry Tasch being surety. Under heading: 'Essoins'.[154]
- 1323-08-05; court at Wakefield. John Hode essoins by John de Sandale. Under heading: 'Essoins'.[155]
- 1323-08-24; court at Wakefield. John Hode essoins by William Filche. Under heading: 'Essoins'.[156]
- 1324-05-06: court at Wakefield. John Hode essoins by William de Castilford. Under heading: 'Essoins'.[157]
- 1324/25-01-13; court at Wakefield. John Hood member of a jury which acquits Robert son of Ivo de Snaipthorp of stealing beasts from Emma Brounsmith. Under heading: 'Thornes'.[158]
- 1325-07-26; court at Wakefield. 'John Hode of Wakefeld' essoins by John Hode, clerk. Under heading: 'Essoins'.[159]
- 1325-09-07; court at Wakefield. John Hood essoins by Thomas Torald, surety is William del Okes. Heading: 'Essoins'.[160]
- 1325-09-07; court at Wakefield. John Hood fined 2d for dry wood.[161]
- 1327-05-06; court at Wakefield. John Hodde essoins by William Templer; surety is Thomas Alayn. Under heading: 'Essoins'.[162]
- 129-05-03; sheriff's tourn at Wakefeld. The wives of John Hood, Thomas Tutche and many others fined for ale contrary to assize. Heading: 'Wakefeld'.[163]
Unless we believe both John Hood of Sowerby and John Hood of Wakefield sat on juries in 1316, we must assume that all of the entries just listed refer to the Wakefield man, but there is of course the possibility that the Sowerby and Wakefield John Hood were one and the same person. The man I have referred to as John Hood of Sowerby is in fact never explicitly connected with that town, but his two sons (or two of his sons) are, and cases concerning him are listed under that locality. One or both sons named Robert Hood was/were involved in property transactions there, one was injured there, and both were fined for animals straying into the wood there. Whether or not he should be identified with his namesake of Sowerby, the Wakefield John Hood could be the father of the Robert Hood of Wakefield who is mentioned in 1313 and 1314 (once each year) as well as 1315 and 1316 (twice each year), but of this we have no evidence whatsoever. It is not clear with which namesake, if any, we should identify the 'John Hode, clerk' by whom 'John Hode of Wakefeld' essoined on 26 July 1325 or, for that matter, which of them (if any) is the man whose life record in the manor court rolls is listed above.
John Hood of Wakefield (II)
See 'John Hood of Wakefield (I)' above, list item dated 1325-07-26 and discussion after the list. This man is connected with Wakefield solely through his essoining for his namesake of Wakefield.
Peter Hood of Wakefield
Three entries found:
- 1331-09-21. Peter Hood essoins by Robert de Mora. Surety is William Templer. Court at Wakefield. Heading 'Essoins'.[164]
- 1332-10-23. Peter Hode for the first time [essoigns] by Thomas Torald. No heading.[165]
- 1332-11-23. Peter Hode and William Whighe [fined] for drawing the blood of William Capon and Thomas Fogald, 12d each. Heading: 'Thornes'.[166]
A tale of thieves
John Hood was on a jury which c. 25 July 1316 dealt with an intriguing case:
Richard del Wyndhill — taken as a suspected thief, because he came with a message from several thieves to the wife of the late William de Stodlay [? begging] victuals for the said thieves, and because he threatened the woman to burn her unless she sent food and money by him, and fled when the Earl's foresters tried to attach him for this, and shot at the said foresters with arrows — being asked what he has to say, denies the charges, and refers himself to the court. An inquisition is taken by the oaths of . . . . . . Thorneton, John de la More, William del Okes, Thomas del Bellehous, Richard de Salsa-mara, Richard de Birstall, Robert de Heyrode, Robert de la Grene, Richard de Crosseland, John Hood of Wakefeld, John, s. of Hugh de Northland, and Richard de Counhale — by whom he is found not guilty of frequenting the company of thieves, etc.[167]
This occurs in a section apparently dealing with cases from 'Hipperum', i.e. Hipperholme, c. 3.25 km east of Halifax. Salsa-mara is Saltmarsh.[168] Whether or not the widow was telling the truth, her story sounds more credible than many outlaw tales.
Robert Hoods known from other sources
Here follow records other than manor court rolls relating to Robert Hoods who lived in areas with land belonging to the Manor of Wakefield.
To the sheriff of Middlesex. Writ of supersedeas, by mainprise of John Bather and John Wylde of Hertfordshire, Thomas Belgrave of London and Robert Ode of Yorkshire, in favour of William de Bereford at suit of the king for his ransom for disseising John de Langeford of tenements in Harewe and Great Stanmere, and Mary who was wife of William de Langeford of tenements in those towns.[169]
Background
- Barber, Brian 2017a. Freely available online
- Wikipedia: Alverthorpe
- Wikipedia: Hipperholme
- Wikipedia: Sowerby
- Wikipedia: Stanley, West Yorkshire
- Wikipedia: Wakefield
- Yorkshire Archaeological Society: Wakefield Court Rolls.
Also see
- 1317 - Richard of the Lee of Rastrick
- 1324 - Little John de Cokcroft
- 1651 - Court Rolls of Manor of Wakefield
- Persons named Roger of Doncaster (record texts)
- Prioresses of Kirklees
- Robin Hood Street Close (Outwood)
- Roger de Doncaster in Sandal (record texts)
- Sheriffs of Nottingham: Henry de Fauconberg.
Notes
- ↑ See Yorkshire Archaeological Society: Wakefield Court Rolls.
- ↑ Hunter, Joseph. The Great Hero of the Ancient Minstrelsy of England, "Robin Hood." His Period, Real Character, etc. investigated and perhaps ascertained (Critical and Historical Tracts, No. 4) (London, 1852).
- ↑ Baildon, William Paley, ed. Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, vol. II: 1297 to 1309 (The Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. XXXVI) (Leeds, 1906), p. 74.
- ↑ Baildon, William Paley, ed. Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, vol. II: 1297 to 1309 (The Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. XXXVI) (Leeds, 1906), p. 191.
- ↑ Baildon, William Paley, ed. Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, vol. II: 1297 to 1309 (The Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. XXXVI) (Leeds, 1906), p. 182.
- ↑ Baildon, William Paley, ed. Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, vol. II: 1297 to 1309 (The Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. XXXVI) (Leeds, 1906), p. 191.
- ↑ Baildon, William Paley, ed. Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, vol. II: 1297 to 1309 (The Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. XXXVI) (Leeds, 1906), p. 198.
- ↑ Baildon, William Paley, ed. Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, vol. II: 1297 to 1309 (The Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. XXXVI) (Leeds, 1906), p. 219.
- ↑ Lister, John, ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.]; [Longbotham, A.T., index.]. Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield. Vol. IV. 1315 to 1317 (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. LXXVIII) (1930), p. 68.
- ↑ Lister, John, ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.]; [Longbotham, A.T., index.]. Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield. Vol. IV. 1315 to 1317 (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. LXXVIII) (1930), p. 72.
- ↑ Lister, John, ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.]; [Longbotham, A.T., index.]. Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield. Vol. IV. 1315 to 1317 (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. LXXVIII) (1930), p. 72.
- ↑ Lister, John, ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.]; [Longbotham, A.T., index.]. Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield. Vol. IV. 1315 to 1317 (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. LXXVIII) (1930), p. 134.
- ↑ Lister, John, ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.]; [Longbotham, A.T., index.]. Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield. Vol. IV. 1315 to 1317 (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. LXXVIII) (1930), p. 172.
- ↑ Walker, J.W., ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.], Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield. Vol. V. 1322-1331 (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. CIX) (1945), p. 15.
- ↑ Walker, J.W., ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.], Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield. Vol. V. 1322-1331 (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. CIX) (1945), p. 21.
- ↑ Walker, J.W., ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.], Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield. Vol. V. 1322-1331 (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. CIX) (1945), p. 32.
- ↑ Walker, Sue Sheridan, ed.; Vaughan, Richard, gen. ed. & introd. The Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield from October 1331 to September 1333 (The Wakefield Court Rolls Series of the Yorkshire Archaeological Society, vol. III) (Leeds, 1983), pp. 173-74.
- ↑ Katherine, M. Troup, ed.; Fraser, C. M., gen. ed. The Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield from October 1338 to September 1340 (The Wakefield Court Rolls Series of the Yorkshire Archaeological Society, vol. XII) (Leeds, 1999), p. 25.
- ↑ Katherine, M. Troup, ed.; Fraser, C. M., gen. ed. The Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield from October 1338 to September 1340 (The Wakefield Court Rolls Series of the Yorkshire Archaeological Society, vol. XII) (Leeds, 1999), p. 28.
- ↑ Katherine, M. Troup, ed.; Fraser, C. M., gen. ed. The Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield from October 1338 to September 1340 (The Wakefield Court Rolls Series of the Yorkshire Archaeological Society, vol. XII) (Leeds, 1999), p. 34.
- ↑ Katherine, M. Troup, ed.; Fraser, C. M., gen. ed. The Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield from October 1338 to September 1340 (The Wakefield Court Rolls Series of the Yorkshire Archaeological Society, vol. XII) (Leeds, 1999), p. 36.
- ↑ Katherine, M. Troup, ed.; Fraser, C. M., gen. ed. The Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield from October 1338 to September 1340 (The Wakefield Court Rolls Series of the Yorkshire Archaeological Society, vol. XII) (Leeds, 1999), p. 42.
- ↑ Katherine, M. Troup, ed.; Fraser, C. M., gen. ed. The Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield from October 1338 to September 1340 (The Wakefield Court Rolls Series of the Yorkshire Archaeological Society, vol. XII) (Leeds, 1999), p. 75.
- ↑ Katherine, M. Troup, ed.; Fraser, C. M., gen. ed. The Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield from October 1338 to September 1340 (The Wakefield Court Rolls Series of the Yorkshire Archaeological Society, vol. XII) (Leeds, 1999), p. 138.
- ↑ Katherine, M. Troup, ed.; Fraser, C. M., gen. ed. The Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield from October 1338 to September 1340 (The Wakefield Court Rolls Series of the Yorkshire Archaeological Society, vol. XII) (Leeds, 1999), p. 142.
- ↑ Katherine, M. Troup, ed.; Fraser, C. M., gen. ed. The Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield from October 1338 to September 1340 (The Wakefield Court Rolls Series of the Yorkshire Archaeological Society, vol. XII) (Leeds, 1999), p. 221.
- ↑ Katherine, M. Troup, ed.; Fraser, C. M., gen. ed. The Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield from October 1338 to September 1340 (The Wakefield Court Rolls Series of the Yorkshire Archaeological Society, vol. XII) (Leeds, 1999), p. 225.
- ↑ Walker, J.W., ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.], Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield. Vol. V. 1322-1331 (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. CIX) (1945), p. 33.
- ↑ Walker, Sue Sheridan, ed.; Vaughan, Richard, gen. ed. & introd. The Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield from October 1331 to September 1333 (The Wakefield Court Rolls Series of the Yorkshire Archaeological Society, vol. III) (Leeds, 1983), p. 203.
- ↑ Lister, John, ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.]; [Longbotham, A.T., index.]. Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield. Vol. IV. 1315 to 1317 (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. LXXVIII) (1930), p. 107.
- ↑ Lister, John, ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.]; [Longbotham, A.T., index.]. Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield. Vol. IV. 1315 to 1317 (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. LXXVIII) (1930), p. 186.
- ↑ Lister, John, ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.]; [Longbotham, A.T., index.]. Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield. Vol. IV. 1315 to 1317 (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. LXXVIII) (1930), p. 190.
- ↑ Lister, John, ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.]; [Longbotham, A.T., index.]. Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield. Vol. IV. 1315 to 1317 (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. LXXVIII) (1930), p. 201.
- ↑ Walker, J.W., ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.], Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield. Vol. V. 1322-1331 (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. CIX) (1945), p. 4.
- ↑ Walker, J.W., ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.], Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield. Vol. V. 1322-1331 (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. CIX) (1945), p. 20.
- ↑ Walker, J.W., ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.], Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield. Vol. V. 1322-1331 (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. CIX) (1945), p. 28.
- ↑ Walker, J.W., ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.], Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield. Vol. V. 1322-1331 (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. CIX) (1945), p. 28.
- ↑ Walker, J.W., ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.], Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield. Vol. V. 1322-1331 (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. CIX) (1945), p. 35.
- ↑ Walker, J.W., ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.], Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield. Vol. V. 1322-1331 (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. CIX) (1945), p. 37.
- ↑ Walker, J.W., ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.], Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield. Vol. V. 1322-1331 (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. CIX) (1945), p. 44.
- ↑ Walker, J.W., ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.], Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield. Vol. V. 1322-1331 (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. CIX) (1945), p. 72.
- ↑ Walker, J.W., ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.], Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield. Vol. V. 1322-1331 (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. CIX) (1945), p. 75.
- ↑ Walker, J.W., ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.], Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield. Vol. V. 1322-1331 (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. CIX) (1945), p. 150.
- ↑ Walker, Sue Sheridan, ed.; Vaughan, Richard, gen. ed. & introd. The Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield from October 1331 to September 1333 (The Wakefield Court Rolls Series of the Yorkshire Archaeological Society, vol. III) (Leeds, 1983), p. 4.
- ↑ Walker, Sue Sheridan, ed.; Vaughan, Richard, gen. ed. & introd. The Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield from October 1331 to September 1333 (The Wakefield Court Rolls Series of the Yorkshire Archaeological Society, vol. III) (Leeds, 1983), p. 4.
- ↑ Walker, Sue Sheridan, ed.; Vaughan, Richard, gen. ed. & introd. The Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield from October 1331 to September 1333 (The Wakefield Court Rolls Series of the Yorkshire Archaeological Society, vol. III) (Leeds, 1983), p. 10.
- ↑ Walker, Sue Sheridan, ed.; Vaughan, Richard, gen. ed. & introd. The Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield from October 1331 to September 1333 (The Wakefield Court Rolls Series of the Yorkshire Archaeological Society, vol. III) (Leeds, 1983), pp. 10-11.
- ↑ Walker, Sue Sheridan, ed.; Vaughan, Richard, gen. ed. & introd. The Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield from October 1331 to September 1333 (The Wakefield Court Rolls Series of the Yorkshire Archaeological Society, vol. III) (Leeds, 1983), p. 11.
- ↑ Walker, Sue Sheridan, ed.; Vaughan, Richard, gen. ed. & introd. The Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield from October 1331 to September 1333 (The Wakefield Court Rolls Series of the Yorkshire Archaeological Society, vol. III) (Leeds, 1983), p. 11.
- ↑ Walker, Sue Sheridan, ed.; Vaughan, Richard, gen. ed. & introd. The Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield from October 1331 to September 1333 (The Wakefield Court Rolls Series of the Yorkshire Archaeological Society, vol. III) (Leeds, 1983), p. 15.
- ↑ Walker, Sue Sheridan, ed.; Vaughan, Richard, gen. ed. & introd. The Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield from October 1331 to September 1333 (The Wakefield Court Rolls Series of the Yorkshire Archaeological Society, vol. III) (Leeds, 1983), p. 15.
- ↑ Walker, Sue Sheridan, ed.; Vaughan, Richard, gen. ed. & introd. The Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield from October 1331 to September 1333 (The Wakefield Court Rolls Series of the Yorkshire Archaeological Society, vol. III) (Leeds, 1983), p. 30.
- ↑ Walker, Sue Sheridan, ed.; Vaughan, Richard, gen. ed. & introd. The Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield from October 1331 to September 1333 (The Wakefield Court Rolls Series of the Yorkshire Archaeological Society, vol. III) (Leeds, 1983), p. 30.
- ↑ Walker, Sue Sheridan, ed.; Vaughan, Richard, gen. ed. & introd. The Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield from October 1331 to September 1333 (The Wakefield Court Rolls Series of the Yorkshire Archaeological Society, vol. III) (Leeds, 1983), p. 30.
- ↑ Walker, Sue Sheridan, ed.; Vaughan, Richard, gen. ed. & introd. The Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield from October 1331 to September 1333 (The Wakefield Court Rolls Series of the Yorkshire Archaeological Society, vol. III) (Leeds, 1983), p. 30.
- ↑ Walker, Sue Sheridan, ed.; Vaughan, Richard, gen. ed. & introd. The Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield from October 1331 to September 1333 (The Wakefield Court Rolls Series of the Yorkshire Archaeological Society, vol. III) (Leeds, 1983), p. 165.
- ↑ Walker, Sue Sheridan, ed.; Vaughan, Richard, gen. ed. & introd. The Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield from October 1331 to September 1333 (The Wakefield Court Rolls Series of the Yorkshire Archaeological Society, vol. III) (Leeds, 1983), p. 181.
- ↑ Walker, Sue Sheridan, ed.; Vaughan, Richard, gen. ed. & introd. The Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield from October 1331 to September 1333 (The Wakefield Court Rolls Series of the Yorkshire Archaeological Society, vol. III) (Leeds, 1983), p. 195.
- ↑ Walker, Sue Sheridan, ed.; Vaughan, Richard, gen. ed. & introd. The Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield from October 1331 to September 1333 (The Wakefield Court Rolls Series of the Yorkshire Archaeological Society, vol. III) (Leeds, 1983), pp. 200-201.
- ↑ Walker, Sue Sheridan, ed.; Vaughan, Richard, gen. ed. & introd. The Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield from October 1331 to September 1333 (The Wakefield Court Rolls Series of the Yorkshire Archaeological Society, vol. III) (Leeds, 1983), p. 207.
- ↑ Katherine, M. Troup, ed.; Fraser, C. M., gen. ed. The Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield from October 1338 to September 1340 (The Wakefield Court Rolls Series of the Yorkshire Archaeological Society, vol. XII) (Leeds, 1999), p. 22.
- ↑ Katherine, M. Troup, ed.; Fraser, C. M., gen. ed. The Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield from October 1338 to September 1340 (The Wakefield Court Rolls Series of the Yorkshire Archaeological Society, vol. XII) (Leeds, 1999), p. 26.
- ↑ Katherine, M. Troup, ed.; Fraser, C. M., gen. ed. The Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield from October 1338 to September 1340 (The Wakefield Court Rolls Series of the Yorkshire Archaeological Society, vol. XII) (Leeds, 1999), p. 32.
- ↑ Katherine, M. Troup, ed.; Fraser, C. M., gen. ed. The Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield from October 1338 to September 1340 (The Wakefield Court Rolls Series of the Yorkshire Archaeological Society, vol. XII) (Leeds, 1999), p. 146.
- ↑ Katherine, M. Troup, ed.; Fraser, C. M., gen. ed. The Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield from October 1338 to September 1340 (The Wakefield Court Rolls Series of the Yorkshire Archaeological Society, vol. XII) (Leeds, 1999), p. 211.
- ↑ Katherine, M. Troup, ed.; Fraser, C. M., gen. ed. The Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield from October 1338 to September 1340 (The Wakefield Court Rolls Series of the Yorkshire Archaeological Society, vol. XII) (Leeds, 1999), pp. 222-23.
- ↑ Katherine, M. Troup, ed.; Fraser, C. M., gen. ed. The Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield from October 1338 to September 1340 (The Wakefield Court Rolls Series of the Yorkshire Archaeological Society, vol. XII) (Leeds, 1999), p. 229.
- ↑ Katherine, M. Troup, ed.; Fraser, C. M., gen. ed. The Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield from October 1338 to September 1340 (The Wakefield Court Rolls Series of the Yorkshire Archaeological Society, vol. XII) (Leeds, 1999), p. 234.
- ↑ Katherine, M. Troup, ed.; Fraser, C. M., gen. ed. The Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield from October 1338 to September 1340 (The Wakefield Court Rolls Series of the Yorkshire Archaeological Society, vol. XII) (Leeds, 1999), p. 235.
- ↑ Katherine, M. Troup, ed.; Fraser, C. M., gen. ed. The Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield from October 1338 to September 1340 (The Wakefield Court Rolls Series of the Yorkshire Archaeological Society, vol. XII) (Leeds, 1999), p. 240.
- ↑ Katherine, M. Troup, ed.; Fraser, C. M., gen. ed. The Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield from October 1338 to September 1340 (The Wakefield Court Rolls Series of the Yorkshire Archaeological Society, vol. XII) (Leeds, 1999), p. 244.
- ↑ Katherine, M. Troup, ed.; Fraser, C. M., gen. ed. The Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield from October 1338 to September 1340 (The Wakefield Court Rolls Series of the Yorkshire Archaeological Society, vol. XII) (Leeds, 1999), p. 247.
- ↑ Katherine, M. Troup, ed.; Fraser, C. M., gen. ed. The Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield from October 1338 to September 1340 (The Wakefield Court Rolls Series of the Yorkshire Archaeological Society, vol. XII) (Leeds, 1999), p. 252.
- ↑ Baildon, William Paley, ed. Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, vol. II: 1297 to 1309 (The Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. XXXVI) (Leeds, 1906), p. 177.
- ↑ Lister, John, ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.] Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, vol. III (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. LVII (1917), p. 8.
- ↑ Lister, John, ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.] Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, vol. III (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. LVII (1917), p. 44.
- ↑ Lister, John, ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.] Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, vol. III (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. LVII (1917), p. 54.
- ↑ Lister, John, ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.] Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, vol. III (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. LVII (1917), p. 70.
- ↑ Lister, John, ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.]; [Longbotham, A.T., index.]. Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield. Vol. IV. 1315 to 1317 (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. LXXVIII) (1930), p. 80.
- ↑ Lister, John, ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.]; [Longbotham, A.T., index.]. Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield. Vol. IV. 1315 to 1317 (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. LXXVIII) (1930), p. 121.
- ↑ Walker, J.W., ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.], Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield. Vol. V. 1322-1331 (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. CIX) (1945), p. 193.
- ↑ Walker, Sue Sheridan, ed.; Vaughan, Richard, gen. ed. & introd. The Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield from October 1331 to September 1333 (The Wakefield Court Rolls Series of the Yorkshire Archaeological Society, vol. III) (Leeds, 1983), p. 180.
- ↑ Katherine, M. Troup, ed.; Fraser, C. M., gen. ed. The Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield from October 1338 to September 1340 (The Wakefield Court Rolls Series of the Yorkshire Archaeological Society, vol. XII) (Leeds, 1999), p. 138.
- ↑ Baildon (1901a), p. 96; for date see p. 93
- ↑ Baildon, William Paley, ed. Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, Vol. I: 1274 to 1297 (The Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. XXIX) (Leeds, 1901), p. 104.
- ↑ Baildon, William Paley, ed. Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, Vol. I: 1274 to 1297 (The Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. XXIX) (Leeds, 1901), p. 105.
- ↑ Baildon, William Paley, ed. Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, Vol. I: 1274 to 1297 (The Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. XXIX) (Leeds, 1901), p. 107.
- ↑ Baildon, William Paley, ed. Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, Vol. I: 1274 to 1297 (The Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. XXIX) (Leeds, 1901), p. 142; date cf. p. 137.
- ↑ Baildon, William Paley, ed. Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, Vol. I: 1274 to 1297 (The Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. XXIX) (Leeds, 1901), p. 151f; date cf. p. 151.
- ↑ Baildon, William Paley, ed. Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, Vol. I: 1274 to 1297 (The Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. XXIX) (Leeds, 1901), p. 195; date cf. p. 193.
- ↑ Baildon, William Paley, ed. Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, Vol. I: 1274 to 1297 (The Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. XXIX) (Leeds, 1901), p. 201; date cf. p. 199.
- ↑ Lister, John, ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.] Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, vol. III (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. LVII (1917), p. 178; date cd. p. 176.
- ↑ Baildon, William Paley, ed. Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, Vol. I: 1274 to 1297 (The Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. XXIX) (Leeds, 1901), p. 285; heading cf. p. 283; date cf. pp. 278, 283.
- ↑ Lister, John, ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.] Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, vol. III (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. LVII (1917), p. 1.
- ↑ Lister, John, ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.] Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, vol. III (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. LVII (1917), p. 6.
- ↑ Baildon, William Paley, ed. Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, Vol. I: 1274 to 1297 (The Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. XXIX) (Leeds, 1901), pp. 93-95.
- ↑ Wikipedia: Sowerby.
- ↑ Baildon, William Paley, ed. Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, Vol. I: 1274 to 1297 (The Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. XXIX) (Leeds, 1901), p. 244.
- ↑ Baildon, William Paley, ed. Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, Vol. I: 1274 to 1297 (The Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. XXIX) (Leeds, 1901), p. 244.
- ↑ Baildon, William Paley, ed. Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, Vol. I: 1274 to 1297 (The Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. XXIX) (Leeds, 1901), p. 246; date and location cf. p. 344.
- ↑ Baildon, William Paley, ed. Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, Vol. I: 1274 to 1297 (The Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. XXIX) (Leeds, 1901), p. 284; heading cf. p. 283; date cf. pp. 278, 283.
- ↑ Baildon, William Paley, ed. Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, Vol. I: 1274 to 1297 (The Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. XXIX) (Leeds, 1901), date cf. p. 292; court location cf. p. 287.
- ↑ Baildon, William Paley, ed. Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, Vol. I: 1274 to 1297 (The Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. XXIX) (Leeds, 1901), date cf. p. 296; court location cf. p. 287.
- ↑ Lister, John, ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.] Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, vol. III (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. LVII (1917), p. 95.
- ↑ Walker, Sue Sheridan, ed.; Vaughan, Richard, gen. ed. & introd. The Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield from October 1331 to September 1333 (The Wakefield Court Rolls Series of the Yorkshire Archaeological Society, vol. III) (Leeds, 1983), pp. 141-42.
- ↑ Walker, Sue Sheridan, ed.; Vaughan, Richard, gen. ed. & introd. The Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield from October 1331 to September 1333 (The Wakefield Court Rolls Series of the Yorkshire Archaeological Society, vol. III) (Leeds, 1983), p. 145.
- ↑ Walker, Sue Sheridan, ed.; Vaughan, Richard, gen. ed. & introd. The Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield from October 1331 to September 1333 (The Wakefield Court Rolls Series of the Yorkshire Archaeological Society, vol. III) (Leeds, 1983), p. 149.
- ↑ Baildon, William Paley, ed. Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, Vol. I: 1274 to 1297 (The Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. XXIX) (Leeds, 1901), p. 227; date cf. p. 226
- ↑ Baildon, William Paley, ed. Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, vol. II: 1297 to 1309 (The Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. XXXVI) (Leeds, 1906), p. 182.
- ↑ Baildon, William Paley, ed. Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, vol. II: 1297 to 1309 (The Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. XXXVI) (Leeds, 1906), pp. 200-201.
- ↑ Baildon, William Paley, ed. Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, vol. II: 1297 to 1309 (The Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. XXXVI) (Leeds, 1906), p. 204.
- ↑ Baildon, William Paley, ed. Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, vol. II: 1297 to 1309 (The Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. XXXVI) (Leeds, 1906), p. 216.
- ↑ Lister, John, ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.] Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, vol. III (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. LVII (1917), p. 17.
- ↑ Lister, John, ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.] Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, vol. III (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. LVII (1917), p. 27.
- ↑ Lister, John, ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.] Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, vol. III (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. LVII (1917), pp. 33.
- ↑ Lister, John, ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.] Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, vol. III (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. LVII (1917), p. 84.
- ↑ Lister, John, ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.] Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, vol. III (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. LVII (1917), p. 94.
- ↑ Lister, John, ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.] Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, vol. III (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. LVII (1917), p. 107.
- ↑ Lister, John, ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.] Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, vol. III (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. LVII (1917), p. 130.
- ↑ Lister, John, ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.]; [Longbotham, A.T., index.]. Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield. Vol. IV. 1315 to 1317 (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. LXXVIII) (1930), p. 109.
- ↑ Lister, John, ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.]; [Longbotham, A.T., index.]. Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield. Vol. IV. 1315 to 1317 (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. LXXVIII) (1930), p. 108.
- ↑ Lister, John, ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.]; [Longbotham, A.T., index.]. Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield. Vol. IV. 1315 to 1317 (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. LXXVIII) (1930), p. 140.
- ↑ Walker, Sue Sheridan, ed.; Vaughan, Richard, gen. ed. & introd. The Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield from October 1331 to September 1333 (The Wakefield Court Rolls Series of the Yorkshire Archaeological Society, vol. III) (Leeds, 1983), p. 7.
- ↑ Walker, Sue Sheridan, ed.; Vaughan, Richard, gen. ed. & introd. The Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield from October 1331 to September 1333 (The Wakefield Court Rolls Series of the Yorkshire Archaeological Society, vol. III) (Leeds, 1983), p. 17.
- ↑ Baildon, William Paley, ed. Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, Vol. I: 1274 to 1297 (The Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. XXIX) (Leeds, 1901), p. 92; date cf. p. 87.
- ↑ Baildon, William Paley, ed. Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, Vol. I: 1274 to 1297 (The Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. XXIX) (Leeds, 1901), p. 166; date cf. p. 165.
- ↑ Baildon, William Paley, ed. Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, Vol. I: 1274 to 1297 (The Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. XXIX) (Leeds, 1901), p. 176; date cf. p. 175.
- ↑ Baildon, William Paley, ed. Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, Vol. I: 1274 to 1297 (The Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. XXIX) (Leeds, 1901), p. 194; date cf. p. 193; court location cf. pp. 190, 193.
- ↑ Baildon, William Paley, ed. Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, Vol. I: 1274 to 1297 (The Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. XXIX) (Leeds, 1901), p. 204.
- ↑ Baildon, William Paley, ed. Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, Vol. I: 1274 to 1297 (The Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. XXIX) (Leeds, 1901), p. 238; date cf. p. 237.
- ↑ Baildon, William Paley, ed. Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, Vol. I: 1274 to 1297 (The Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. XXIX) (Leeds, 1901), p. 250; date and location cf. p. 248.
- ↑ Baildon, William Paley, ed. Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, Vol. I: 1274 to 1297 (The Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. XXIX) (Leeds, 1901), p. 266; location cf. p. 263.
- ↑ Baildon, William Paley, ed. Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, Vol. I: 1274 to 1297 (The Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. XXIX) (Leeds, 1901), p. 272; court location cf. p. 263.
- ↑ Baildon, William Paley, ed. Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, Vol. I: 1274 to 1297 (The Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. XXIX) (Leeds, 1901), p. 273; court location cf. p. 263.
- ↑ Baildon, William Paley, ed. Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, Vol. I: 1274 to 1297 (The Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. XXIX) (Leeds, 1901), p. 276; date cf. p. 275; court location cf. p. 263.
- ↑ Baildon, William Paley, ed. Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, Vol. I: 1274 to 1297 (The Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. XXIX) (Leeds, 1901), p. 289; date cf. p. 288; court location cf. p. 287.
- ↑ Baildon, William Paley, ed. Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, Vol. I: 1274 to 1297 (The Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. XXIX) (Leeds, 1901), p. 290; date cf. p. 288; court location cf. p. 287.
- ↑ Lister, John, ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.] Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, vol. III (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. LVII (1917), p. 25.
- ↑ Lister, John, ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.] Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, vol. III (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. LVII (1917), p. 53.
- ↑ Lister, John, ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.] Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, vol. III (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. LVII (1917), p. 66.
- ↑ Baildon, William Paley, ed. Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, Vol. I: 1274 to 1297 (The Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. XXIX) (Leeds, 1901), p. 86; date cf. p. 82.
- ↑ Baildon, William Paley, ed. Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, Vol. I: 1274 to 1297 (The Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. XXIX) (Leeds, 1901), p. 90; date cf. p. 87.
- ↑ Baildon, William Paley, ed. Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, Vol. I: 1274 to 1297 (The Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. XXIX) (Leeds, 1901), p. 92; date cf. p. 87.
- ↑ Lister, John, ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.] Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, vol. III (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. LVII (1917), p. 5.
- ↑ Lister, John, ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.] Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, vol. III (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. LVII (1917), p. 109.
- ↑ Lister, John, ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.] Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, vol. III (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. LVII (1917), p. 112.
- ↑ Lister, John, ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.] Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, vol. III (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. LVII (1917), p. 133.
- ↑ Lister, John, ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.] Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, vol. III (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. LVII (1917), p. 132; court location cf. p. 127; date cf. p. 127.
- ↑ Lister, John, ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.] Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, vol. III (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. LVII (1917), p. 133.
- ↑ Lister, John, ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.] Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, vol. III (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. LVII (1917), p. 136.
- ↑ Lister, John, ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.] Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, vol. III (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. LVII (1917), p. 148.
- ↑ Lister, John, ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.] Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, vol. III (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. LVII (1917), p. 151.
- ↑ Lister, John, ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.] Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, vol. III (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. LVII (1917), p. 154.
- ↑ Walker, J.W., ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.], Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield. Vol. V. 1322-1331 (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. CIX) (1945), p. 1.
- ↑ Walker, J.W., ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.], Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield. Vol. V. 1322-1331 (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. CIX) (1945), p. 23.
- ↑ Walker, J.W., ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.], Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield. Vol. V. 1322-1331 (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. CIX) (1945), p. 24.
- ↑ Walker, J.W., ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.], Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield. Vol. V. 1322-1331 (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. CIX) (1945), pp. 28, 29.
- ↑ Walker, J.W., ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.], Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield. Vol. V. 1322-1331 (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. CIX) (1945), pp. 57, 58.
- ↑ Walker, J.W., ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.], Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield. Vol. V. 1322-1331 (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. CIX) (1945), p. 73.
- ↑ Walker, J.W., ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.], Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield. Vol. V. 1322-1331 (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. CIX) (1945), p. 77.
- ↑ Walker, J.W., ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.], Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield. Vol. V. 1322-1331 (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. CIX) (1945), p. 79.
- ↑ Walker, J.W., ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.], Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield. Vol. V. 1322-1331 (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. CIX) (1945), p. 114.
- ↑ Walker, J.W., ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.], Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield. Vol. V. 1322-1331 (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. CIX) (1945), pp. 145, 148.
- ↑ Walker, J.W., ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.], Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield. Vol. V. 1322-1331 (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. CIX) (1945), p. 197.
- ↑ Walker, Sue Sheridan, ed.; Vaughan, Richard, gen. ed. & introd. The Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield from October 1331 to September 1333 (The Wakefield Court Rolls Series of the Yorkshire Archaeological Society, vol. III) (Leeds, 1983), p. 122.
- ↑ Walker, Sue Sheridan, ed.; Vaughan, Richard, gen. ed. & introd. The Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield from October 1331 to September 1333 (The Wakefield Court Rolls Series of the Yorkshire Archaeological Society, vol. III) (Leeds, 1983), p. 128.
- ↑ Lister, John, ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.] Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, vol. III (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. LVII (1917), p. 148. Lister's brackets and ellipsis.
- ↑ Lister, John, ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.]; [Longbotham, A.T., index.]. Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield. Vol. IV. 1315 to 1317 (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. LXXVIII) (1930), p. 206.
- ↑ [Bird, W.H.B., ed.; Flower, C.T. ed.; Maxwell-Lyte, Henry Churchill, introd.]. Calendar of the Close Rolls, preserved in the Public Record Office: Richard II. Vol. I. A.D. 1377-1381 (London and Cardiff; Edinburgh; Dublin, 1914), p. 115.