1315 - Robert and Robert sons of John Hood: Difference between revisions
From International Robin Hood Bibliography
m (Text replacement - "=== IRHB comments ===" to "== IRHB comments ==") |
m (Text replacement - "=== Lists ===" to "== Lists ==") |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
The most natural reading seems to be that the two Roberts were brothers, but we cannot rule out the possibility that "his" in "his brother" refers to John Hodde, in which case Roberts I and II would of course be nephew and uncle. | The most natural reading seems to be that the two Roberts were brothers, but we cannot rule out the possibility that "his" in "his brother" refers to John Hodde, in which case Roberts I and II would of course be nephew and uncle. | ||
== Lists == | |||
* Not included in {{:Sussex, Lucy 1994a}}. | * Not included in {{:Sussex, Lucy 1994a}}. | ||
Revision as of 12:49, 28 July 2018
| Record | |
|---|---|
| Date | 1315 |
| Topic | Robert, son of John Hood, and Robert his brother fined for escapes in the frith. |
Sowerby.
By Henrik Thiil Nielsen, 2015-08-31. Revised by Henrik Thiil Nielsen, 2018-07-28.
Record
[1315:]
Robert, s. of John Hodde, 6d.; Robert, his brother, 3d. [...] for escapes in the Frith.[1]
Source notes
Wakefield Manor Court, at Wakefield (West Riding of Yorkshire), on Friday after Michaelmas, under the section heading "Sourby", i.e. Sowerby; membrane 1.[2]
IRHB comments
The most natural reading seems to be that the two Roberts were brothers, but we cannot rule out the possibility that "his" in "his brother" refers to John Hodde, in which case Roberts I and II would of course be nephew and uncle.
Lists
- Not included in Sussex, Lucy, compil. 'References to Robin Hood up to 1600', in: Knight, Stephen. Robin Hood: A Complete Study of the English Outlaw (Oxford, UK; Cambridge, Massachusetts: Blackwell, 1994), pp. 262-88.
Sources
Background
Cross-references
Notes