Tales of Robin Hood are good enough for fools: Difference between revisions

From International Robin Hood Bibliography
m (Text replacement - " === Notes ===" to " === Notes ===")
 
m (Text replacement - ".</p><div class="no-img">" to ".</p> <div class="no-img">")
Line 1: Line 1:
<p id="byline">By Henrik Thiil Nielsen, 2014-08-10. Revised by {{#realname:{{REVISIONUSER}}}}, {{REVISIONYEAR}}-{{REVISIONMONTH}}-{{REVISIONDAY2}}.</p><div class="no-img">
<p id="byline">By Henrik Thiil Nielsen, 2014-08-10. Revised by {{#realname:{{REVISIONUSER}}}}, {{REVISIONYEAR}}-{{REVISIONMONTH}}-{{REVISIONDAY2}}.</p>
<div class="no-img">
The proverb ''<section begin=proverb />Tales of Robin Hood are good enough for fools<section end=proverb />'' (with variants such as "good for", "among fools" etc.) is among the most often cited adages relating to the outlaw through the ages. As John S. Farmer noted in explaining this proverb, "the story of Robin Hood ultimately grew so misty and traditional that the name became a generic byword for the marvellous that was not believable."<ref>{{:Heywood, John 1906a}}, p. 191.</ref>
The proverb ''<section begin=proverb />Tales of Robin Hood are good enough for fools<section end=proverb />'' (with variants such as "good for", "among fools" etc.) is among the most often cited adages relating to the outlaw through the ages. As John S. Farmer noted in explaining this proverb, "the story of Robin Hood ultimately grew so misty and traditional that the name became a generic byword for the marvellous that was not believable."<ref>{{:Heywood, John 1906a}}, p. 191.</ref>



Revision as of 12:31, 18 December 2017

By Henrik Thiil Nielsen, 2014-08-10. Revised by Henrik Thiil Nielsen, 2017-12-18.

The proverb Tales of Robin Hood are good enough for fools (with variants such as "good for", "among fools" etc.) is among the most often cited adages relating to the outlaw through the ages. As John S. Farmer noted in explaining this proverb, "the story of Robin Hood ultimately grew so misty and traditional that the name became a generic byword for the marvellous that was not believable."[1]

Citations