Studies and criticism (festivals): Difference between revisions

From International Robin Hood Bibliography
m (Text replacement - "=== Background ===" to "== Background ==")
Line 31: Line 31:
* {{:Warren, Nathan Boughton 1868a}}. Discusses Robin Hood in connection with mayings and morris dances, pp. 124, 140, 141, 142 & 142 n.
* {{:Warren, Nathan Boughton 1868a}}. Discusses Robin Hood in connection with mayings and morris dances, pp. 124, 140, 141, 142 & 142 n.


=== Background ===
== Background ==
* {{:Fossenius, Mai 1951a}}. The chief focus in this ethnological dissertation on "May branch, May tree, Maypole" is on the still thriving Swedish Midsummer festival, to which May customs were transferred for climatic reasons, but almost half the study is taken up by an investigation into the European origins and development of May customs. Throughout, these festival traditions are seen as being significant to participants rather than as "survivals". One or two generations before this was belatedly realized in English folklore circles, Swedish scholars had become aware that the notion of "pre-Christian" fertility rite" was largely irrelevant, if not necessarily entirely wrong. No doubt the history and "meaning" of these festival traditions seemed particularly important issues to Swedish ethnologists of the first half of the 20th century because such traditions were (are) still very much alive in Sweden. The book has a chiefly continental European focus but also touches on English traditions and evidence. There is, however, no discussion of the Robin Hood tradition. Still the book is well worth reading as it includes the most extensive and thorough discussion of European May traditions available in a book length study. The dissertation is in Swedish, but there is a 33 page summary in German.
* {{:Fossenius, Mai 1951a}}. The chief focus in this ethnological dissertation on "May branch, May tree, Maypole" is on the still thriving Swedish Midsummer festival, to which May customs were transferred for climatic reasons, but almost half the study is taken up by an investigation into the European origins and development of May customs. Throughout, these festival traditions are seen as being significant to participants rather than as "survivals". One or two generations before this was belatedly realized in English folklore circles, Swedish scholars had become aware that the notion of "pre-Christian" fertility rite" was largely irrelevant, if not necessarily entirely wrong. No doubt the history and "meaning" of these festival traditions seemed particularly important issues to Swedish ethnologists of the first half of the 20th century because such traditions were (are) still very much alive in Sweden. The book has a chiefly continental European focus but also touches on English traditions and evidence. There is, however, no discussion of the Robin Hood tradition. Still the book is well worth reading as it includes the most extensive and thorough discussion of European May traditions available in a book length study. The dissertation is in Swedish, but there is a 33 page summary in German.
* {{:Heaney, Michael 2004a}}. On the earliest (15th century) occurrences of the term 'morris dance' in the English language.
* {{:Heaney, Michael 2004a}}. On the earliest (15th century) occurrences of the term 'morris dance' in the English language.

Revision as of 14:48, 12 July 2018

By Henrik Thiil Nielsen, 2013-06-28. Revised by Henrik Thiil Nielsen, 2018-07-12.

The list includes sources discussing festivals in England and/or Scotland in general or in specific historical counties or other similar areas. Sources dealing only with specific localities are found under the localities in question.

Significant

Of interest

Background

Brief mention