Origins and history: Difference between revisions

From International Robin Hood Bibliography
mNo edit summary
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
** {{:Aston, T H 1976a}}
** {{:Aston, T H 1976a}}
** {{:Aston, T H 1981a}}
** {{:Aston, T H 1981a}}
* {{:Crook, David 2020a}}
* {{:Dobson, Richard Barrie 1972a}}
* {{:Dobson, Richard Barrie 1972a}}
* {{:Dobson, Richard Barrie 1976a}}, pp. 10-16
* {{:Dobson, Richard Barrie 1976a}}, pp. 10-16
Line 61: Line 62:
* {{:Rahman, Sabina 2016a}}.
* {{:Rahman, Sabina 2016a}}.


=== Of some interest ===
=== Of interest ===
* {{:Brooks, E St John 1944a}}. A remarkably naive review of: {{:Walker, John William 1944a}}
* {{:Brooks, E St John 1944a}}. A remarkably naive review of: {{:Walker, John William 1944a}}
* {{:Harrison, Dick 1998a}}. In Swedish. The writer is a reader in history at the University of Lund, Sweden. While this is interesting, one might have expected more than a rather uncritical rehash of the Hunter/Harris/Bellamy thesis from a tenured academic with a degree in a relevant discipline.
* {{:Harrison, Dick 1998a}}. In Swedish. The writer is a reader in history at the University of Lund, Sweden. While this is interesting, one might have expected more than a rather uncritical rehash of the Hunter/Harris/Bellamy thesis from a tenured academic with a degree in a relevant discipline.
Line 73: Line 74:
* {{:Latham, Andrew 2020c}}
* {{:Latham, Andrew 2020c}}
* {{:Latham, Andrew 2020d}}
* {{:Latham, Andrew 2020d}}
* {{:McGlynn, Sean 2018a}}
* {{:McGlynn, Sean 2020a}}
* {{:Morris, John Edward 1901a}}, pp. 33, 101-102; on the possible 13th cent. origin of the Robin Hood tradition and possible connection with the (aftermath of) the Barons' War; the longbow connected with a later period
* {{:Morris, John Edward 1901a}}, pp. 33, 101-102; on the possible 13th cent. origin of the Robin Hood tradition and possible connection with the (aftermath of) the Barons' War; the longbow connected with a later period
** {{:Strongbow 1979a}}; discusses problematic statements on archery in this book; see p. 4 for discussion of Morris's passage on Robin Hood
** {{:Strongbow 1979a}}; discusses problematic statements on archery in this book; see p. 4 for discussion of Morris's passage on Robin Hood
Line 85: Line 88:
* {{:S, E 1882a}}. Develops the well-known thesis that Robin Hood was a historical earl of Huntingdon
* {{:S, E 1882a}}. Develops the well-known thesis that Robin Hood was a historical earl of Huntingdon
* {{:Walker, John William 1944a}}
* {{:Walker, John William 1944a}}
* {{:Walker, John William 1944b}}
* {{:Walker, John William 1952a}}
* {{:Walker, John William 1952a}}
** {{:Walker, John William 1973a}}
** {{:Walker, John William 1973a}}
Line 120: Line 124:
== Brief mention ==
== Brief mention ==
* {{:Coss, Peter R 2010a}}. Obituary; briefly discusses Hilton's foundational role in the modern historical debate on the significance of the early Robin Hood tradition
* {{:Coss, Peter R 2010a}}. Obituary; briefly discusses Hilton's foundational role in the modern historical debate on the significance of the early Robin Hood tradition
* {{:Palmer, Charles Ferrers Raymund 1845a}}, p. 62. See [[1845 - Palmer, Charles Ferrers - History of Tamworth (2)]]
* {{:Planché, James Robinson 1852a}}; see p. 202: on "Ralph Fitz Odo, the reputed ancestor of Robert Fitz Odo, or Fitzooth, one of the presumed historical originals of the popular legendary hero, Robin Hood"
* {{:Planché, James Robinson 1852a}}; see p. 202: on "Ralph Fitz Odo, the reputed ancestor of Robert Fitz Odo, or Fitzooth, one of the presumed historical originals of the popular legendary hero, Robin Hood"
* {{:Randall, James Lowndes 1901a}}, vol. I, pp. 135-36: Should Robin Hood be identified with Robert de Ferrers? See
** [[1901 - Randall, J L - History of Meynell Hounds (2)]]
** [[1901 - Randall, J L - History of Meynell Hounds (3)]].
* {{:Reid, A G 1875a}}.
* {{:Reid, A G 1875a}}.
</div>
</div>

Latest revision as of 04:48, 9 January 2021

By Henrik Thiil Nielsen, 2013-07-07. Revised by Henrik Thiil Nielsen, 2021-01-09.

Essential

Significant

Useful

Of interest

Unacademic

Not seen

Brief mention