Origins and history: Difference between revisions

From International Robin Hood Bibliography
Line 40: Line 40:


=== Significant ===
=== Significant ===
* {{:Bellamy, John G 1985a}}. While this sustained attempt to salvage and redevelop the Hunter/Walker/Harris hypothesis should be of interest to anyone with a serious interest in the Robin Hood tradition, it also exemplifies, more than any other academic contribution to the topic, the "empiricist" tendency among historians so often criticized by Stephen Knight. See: Nielsen, Henrik Thiil, below.
* {{:Bellamy, John G 1985a}}. While this sustained attempt to salvage and redevelop the Hunter/Walker/Harris hypothesis should be of interest to anyone with a serious interest in the Robin Hood tradition, its basic assumption that the [[Gest of Robyn Hode]] can be read as an historical source is highly questionable.
* {{:Bradbury, Jim 1985a}}, ch. 5 (pp. 58-70); 'Robin Hood'
* {{:Bradbury, Jim 1985a}}, ch. 5 (pp. 58-70); 'Robin Hood'
* {{:Crook, David 1988a}}
* {{:Crook, David 1988a}}

Revision as of 17:01, 4 September 2020

By Henrik Thiil Nielsen, 2013-07-07. Revised by Henrik Thiil Nielsen, 2020-09-04.

Essential

Significant

Useful

Of some interest

Unacademic

Not seen

Brief mention