Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "1709 - Proceedings of the Old Bailey"

m (Text replacement - "=== Notes ===" to "== Notes ==")
m (Text replacement - "=== Lists ===" to "== Lists ==")
Line 18: Line 18:
 
IRHB has silently regularized the use of spaces before punctuation marks in the quotation, corrected the HTML text at [https://www.oldbaileyonline.org/browse.jsp?id=t17091207-38&div=t17091207-38&terms=pindar#highlight Proceedings of the Old Bailey] from the PDF of the original printed edition and replaced black letter with italic type in the names of the defendants.
 
IRHB has silently regularized the use of spaces before punctuation marks in the quotation, corrected the HTML text at [https://www.oldbaileyonline.org/browse.jsp?id=t17091207-38&div=t17091207-38&terms=pindar#highlight Proceedings of the Old Bailey] from the PDF of the original printed edition and replaced black letter with italic type in the names of the defendants.
  
=== Lists ===
+
== Lists ==
 
* Not included in {{:Sussex, Lucy 1994a}}.
 
* Not included in {{:Sussex, Lucy 1994a}}.
  

Revision as of 08:51, 28 July 2018

Record
Date 1709
Topic Three men indicted for robbery against Isaac Cook between Grays Inn Lane and the Pindar of Wakefield
Loading map...
The Pindar of Wakefield (328 Grays Inn Road), now The Water Rats.

By Henrik Thiil Nielsen, 2018-01-15. Revised by Henrik Thiil Nielsen, 2018-07-28.

Record

[7 Dec. 1709:]
Henry Rout, Thomas Evans and S—, of the Parish of Pancrass, were all 3 Indicted for assaulting Isaac Cook upon the Queens Highway, and taking from him a Silver Watch value 7 l. a steel Snuff Box 10 s. a Raisor 2 s. 2 silver Medals 5 s. and 15 s. in Mony, the Goods and Mony of the said Cook, on the 14th of October last. The Prosecutor depos'd, that Riding to Kentish Town, between Grays-Inn-Lane and Pindar of Wakefield, was met by 3 Men, 2 of them, (viz.) Rout and Evans assaulted him with drawn Swords, and took from him the Goods mention'd in the Indictment: These 2 the Prosecutor swore positively to, having had a perfect view of them. It further appear'd that they were afterwards seen with part of the Goods, some of which were taken upon them, and produc'd in Court. The Evidence being positive against the said Rout and Evans, and they saying nothing for themselves, the jury found them guilty of the Indictment . But nothing more being prov'd against S—, than that he was seen soon after the Robbery, in the Company of the other 2, the Jury acquitted him.[1]

Source notes

IRHB has silently regularized the use of spaces before punctuation marks in the quotation, corrected the HTML text at Proceedings of the Old Bailey from the PDF of the original printed edition and replaced black letter with italic type in the names of the defendants.

Lists

Sources

Also see

Notes