1731 - Proceedings of the Old Bailey (1): Difference between revisions

From International Robin Hood Bibliography
m (Text replacement - "</div><div class="no-img">" to "</div> <div class="no-img">")
 
(34 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
  |data2={{#sub:{{PAGENAME}}|0|4}}
  |data2={{#sub:{{PAGENAME}}|0|4}}
  |label3=Topic
  |label3=Topic
  |data3=Thieves pretend stolen goods were bought at the Pindar of Wakefield (Grays Inn Road)
  |data3=[[About::Thieves pretend stolen goods were bought at the Pindar of Wakefield (Grays Inn Road)]]
}}
}}
{{#display_map:51.529015,-0.119587|width=34%}}<div class="pnMapLegend">The Pindar of Wakefield (328 Grays Inn Road), now The Water Rats.</div>
{{#display_map:51.529015,-0.119587|width=34%|enablefullscreen=yes}}<div class="pnMapLegend">The Pindar of Wakefield (328 Grays Inn Road), now The Water Rats.</div>
<div class="no-img">
<p id="byline">By Henrik Thiil Nielsen, 2018-01-16. Revised by {{#realname:{{REVISIONUSER}}}}, {{REVISIONYEAR}}-{{REVISIONMONTH}}-{{REVISIONDAY2}}.</p>
<p id="byline">By Henrik Thiil Nielsen, 2018-01-16. Revised by {{#realname:{{REVISIONUSER}}}}, {{REVISIONYEAR}}-{{REVISIONMONTH}}-{{REVISIONDAY2}}.</p>
<div class="no-img">
== Record ==
=== Record ===
<onlyinclude>
<onlyinclude>
{{quote|[13 Oct. 1731:]<br/>
{{quote|[13 Oct. 1731:]<br/>
Line 19: Line 19:
''Hugh Farnsworth'' depos'd, That he seeing the Prisoners (who were two young Boys) about 8 o'Clock in the Morning coming from the Brick-Kiln-Yard, and ''Robert Smith'' ringing a Bell, he asked him, If he would sell it? To which he reply'd Yes, Master, and I have other Things to sell, shewing him a Box with some Buttons, &c. in it, that examining how they came by them, they pretended they had bought them for 6 ''d.'' at the <keyword>''Pindar of Wakefield''</keyword>, but he suspecting them, went to enquire, and not meeting with any Confirmation, he went into ''Holbourn'', and put them into the Custody of an Officer, ''Smith'' at last owned he had broken open the Prosecutor's Stall, but said that ''Thomas Rayner'' was not with him at stealing the Goods. The Fact being clearly proved against ''Robert Smith'', the Jury found him Guilty to the Value of 10 ''d.'' but there not being sufficient Evidence against ''Thomas Rayner'', he was acquitted.<ref>[https://www.oldbaileyonline.org/browse.jsp?id=t17311013-12&div=t17311013-12&terms=pindar#highlight Proceedings of the Old Bailey: Thomas Rayner, Robert Smith, Theft > grand larceny, 13th October 1731.]</ref>}}</onlyinclude>
''Hugh Farnsworth'' depos'd, That he seeing the Prisoners (who were two young Boys) about 8 o'Clock in the Morning coming from the Brick-Kiln-Yard, and ''Robert Smith'' ringing a Bell, he asked him, If he would sell it? To which he reply'd Yes, Master, and I have other Things to sell, shewing him a Box with some Buttons, &c. in it, that examining how they came by them, they pretended they had bought them for 6 ''d.'' at the <keyword>''Pindar of Wakefield''</keyword>, but he suspecting them, went to enquire, and not meeting with any Confirmation, he went into ''Holbourn'', and put them into the Custody of an Officer, ''Smith'' at last owned he had broken open the Prosecutor's Stall, but said that ''Thomas Rayner'' was not with him at stealing the Goods. The Fact being clearly proved against ''Robert Smith'', the Jury found him Guilty to the Value of 10 ''d.'' but there not being sufficient Evidence against ''Thomas Rayner'', he was acquitted.<ref>[https://www.oldbaileyonline.org/browse.jsp?id=t17311013-12&div=t17311013-12&terms=pindar#highlight Proceedings of the Old Bailey: Thomas Rayner, Robert Smith, Theft > grand larceny, 13th October 1731.]</ref>}}</onlyinclude>


=== Source notes ===
== Source notes ==
IRHB has silently regularized the use of spaces before punctuation marks in the quotation, corrected the HTML text at [https://www.oldbaileyonline.org/browse.jsp?id=t17311013-12&div=t17311013-12&terms=pindar#highlight Proceedings from the Old Bailey] from the PDF of the original printed edition and replaced black letter with italic type in the names of the defendants.
IRHB has silently regularized the use of spaces before punctuation marks in the quotation, corrected the HTML text at [https://www.oldbaileyonline.org/browse.jsp?id=t17311013-12&div=t17311013-12&terms=pindar#highlight Proceedings of the Old Bailey] from the PDF of the original printed edition and replaced black letter with italic type in the names of the defendants.


=== Lists ===
== Lists ==
* Not included in {{:Sussex, Lucy 1994a}}.
* Not included in {{:Sussex, Lucy 1994a}}.


=== Sources ===
== Sources ==
* [https://www.oldbaileyonline.org/browse.jsp?id=t17311013-12&div=t17311013-12&terms=pindar#highlight Proceedings of the Old Bailey: Thomas Rayner, Robert Smith, Theft > grand larceny, 13th October 1731.]
* [https://www.oldbaileyonline.org/browse.jsp?id=t17311013-12&div=t17311013-12&terms=pindar#highlight Proceedings of the Old Bailey: Thomas Rayner, Robert Smith, Theft > grand larceny, 13th October 1731.]


=== Also see ===
== Also see ==
* [[1692 - Proceedings of the Old Bailey (2)]]
* [[1692 - Proceedings of the Old Bailey (2)]]
* [[1696 - Proceedings of the Old Bailey]]
* [[1696 - Proceedings of the Old Bailey]]
Line 52: Line 52:
* [[1844 - Proceedings of the Old Bailey (3)]]
* [[1844 - Proceedings of the Old Bailey (3)]]
* [[1844 - Proceedings of the Old Bailey (4)]]
* [[1844 - Proceedings of the Old Bailey (4)]]
* [[1851 - Proceedings of the Old Bailey]]
* [[1851 - Proceedings of the Old Bailey (2)]]
* [[1862 - Proceedings of the Old Bailey]]
* [[1862 - Proceedings of the Old Bailey (1)]]
* [[1870 - Proceedings of the Old Bailey]]
* [[1870 - Proceedings of the Old Bailey (1)]]
* [[1871 - Proceedings of the Old Bailey]]
* [[1871 - Proceedings of the Old Bailey (2)]]
* [[1876 - Proceedings of the Old Bailey]]
* [[1876 - Proceedings of the Old Bailey (3)]]
* [[1907 - Proceedings of the Old Bailey]]
* [[1907 - Proceedings of the Old Bailey (2)]]
* [[1910 - Proceedings of the Old Bailey]]
* [[1910 - Proceedings of the Old Bailey]]
* [[1911 - Proceedings of the Old Bailey]]
* [[1911 - Proceedings of the Old Bailey (1)]]
* [[Grays Inn Road place-name cluster]].
* [[Grays Inn Road place-name cluster]].


=== Notes ===
== Notes ==
<references/>
<references/>


Line 69: Line 69:




{{RecordNav}}
{{RecordsItemNavigation}}
[[Category:Records {{#ifeq:{{#sub:{{PAGENAME}}|2|2}}|00|{{#expr:{{#sub:{{PAGENAME}}|0|4}}-99}}-{{#sub:{{PAGENAME}}|0|4}}|{{#sub:{{PAGENAME}}|0|2}}01-{{#expr: 1+ {{#sub:{{PAGENAME}}|0|2}}}}00}}]]
[[Category:Records (Pinder of Wakefield, Grays Inn Road)]]
[[Category:Records]]
[[Category:Records (Pindar of Wakefield, Grays Inn Road)]]
[[Category:Historiography-topics]]
[[Category:Proceedings of the Old Bailey]]
[[Category:Proceedings of the Old Bailey]]
{{#set:Utitle={{#replace:{{uc:{{PAGENAME}}}}|&#39;|'}}}}

Latest revision as of 07:37, 17 May 2022

Record
Date 1731
Topic Thieves pretend stolen goods were bought at the Pindar of Wakefield (Grays Inn Road)
Loading map...
The Pindar of Wakefield (328 Grays Inn Road), now The Water Rats.

By Henrik Thiil Nielsen, 2018-01-16. Revised by Henrik Thiil Nielsen, 2022-05-17.

Record

[13 Oct. 1731:]
Thomas Rayner and Robert Smith, of St. Andrew's Holborn were indicted for feloniously stealing 4 Brass Dog-Collars, a Bell, some Metal Buckles and Buttons, the Goods of John Moreton, the 1st of this Instant October.

The Prosecutor depos'd, That he keeping a Stall, and selling Cutlery Ware in Holbourn, found his Stall broken open in the Morning, and miss'd his Goods, but knew not who had stolen them, till he saw them, and the Prisoners in the Round-House.

Hugh Farnsworth depos'd, That he seeing the Prisoners (who were two young Boys) about 8 o'Clock in the Morning coming from the Brick-Kiln-Yard, and Robert Smith ringing a Bell, he asked him, If he would sell it? To which he reply'd Yes, Master, and I have other Things to sell, shewing him a Box with some Buttons, &c. in it, that examining how they came by them, they pretended they had bought them for 6 d. at the Pindar of Wakefield, but he suspecting them, went to enquire, and not meeting with any Confirmation, he went into Holbourn, and put them into the Custody of an Officer, Smith at last owned he had broken open the Prosecutor's Stall, but said that Thomas Rayner was not with him at stealing the Goods. The Fact being clearly proved against Robert Smith, the Jury found him Guilty to the Value of 10 d. but there not being sufficient Evidence against Thomas Rayner, he was acquitted.[1]

Source notes

IRHB has silently regularized the use of spaces before punctuation marks in the quotation, corrected the HTML text at Proceedings of the Old Bailey from the PDF of the original printed edition and replaced black letter with italic type in the names of the defendants.

Lists

Sources

Also see

Notes