1316 - Robert and Robert sons of John Hood: Difference between revisions
m (Text replacement - "|service=leaflet|" to "|") |
m (Text replacement - "__NOEDITSECTION__" to "") |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | |||
{{Infobox | {{Infobox | ||
|header1=Record | |header1=Record | ||
Revision as of 09:52, 30 December 2020
| Record | |
|---|---|
| Date | 1316 |
| Topic | Robert and Robert, sons of John Hood, to recover sum from John of Miggeley. |
By Henrik Thiil Nielsen, 2019-03-02. Revised by Henrik Thiil Nielsen, 2020-12-30.
Record
[1316:]
It is found [attinctum] by an Inquisition of the jurors that John of Miggeley by a certain false suggestion which he laid against Robert & Robert [sic] sons of John Hodde unjustly & maliciously recovered against the aforesaid Robert & Robert 10s by a plea in conoscor. It is ordered, therefore, that the aforesaid Robert & Robert recover the aforesaid 10s against the aforesaid John, & that he be amerced 6d, and the aforesaid Robert & Robert pay a fine of 5s for having aid to levy the aforesaid 10s from the aforesaid John.[1]
Source notes
Wakefield Manor court rolls; court held at Halifax (West Riding of Yorkshire), Monday next after the Octave of Easter, 9 Edward II; under section heading "Sourbi", i.e. Sowerby; membrane 11.[2] Italics and brackets (except date) as in printed source.
Lists
- Not included in Sussex, Lucy, compil. 'References to Robin Hood up to 1600', in: Knight, Stephen. Robin Hood: A Complete Study of the English Outlaw (Oxford, UK; Cambridge, Massachusetts: Blackwell, 1994), pp. 262-88.
Sources
- Lister, John, ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.]; [Longbotham, A.T., index.]. Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield. Vol. IV. 1315 to 1317 (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. LXXVIII) (1930), p. 80, and see pp. 77, 78, 79.
Background
Cross-references
Notes