1316 - Robert and Robert sons of John Hood: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
<onlyinclude> | <onlyinclude> | ||
{{quote|[1316:]<br/> | {{quote|[1316:]<br/> | ||
 It is found [''attinctum''] by an Inquisition of the jurors that John of Miggeley by a certain false suggestion which he laid against Robert & Robert [''sic''] sons of John Hodde unjustly & maliciously recovered against the aforesaid Robert & Robert 10<sup>s</sup> by a plea in ''conoscor.'' It is ordered, therefore, that the aforesaid Robert & Robert recover the aforesaid 10<sup>s</sup> against the aforesaid John, & that he be amerced 6<sup>d</sup>, and the aforesaid Robert & Robert pay a fine of 5<sup>s</sup> for having aid to levy the aforesaid 10<sup>s</sup> from the aforesaid John.<ref>{{:Lister, John 1930a}}, p. 80.</ref>}}</onlyinclude> |  It is found [''attinctum''] by an Inquisition of the jurors that John of Miggeley by a certain false suggestion which he laid against <keyword>Robert & Robert [''sic''] sons of John Hodde</keyword> unjustly & maliciously recovered against the aforesaid Robert & Robert 10<sup>s</sup> by a plea in ''conoscor.'' It is ordered, therefore, that the aforesaid Robert & Robert recover the aforesaid 10<sup>s</sup> against the aforesaid John, & that he be amerced 6<sup>d</sup>, and the aforesaid Robert & Robert pay a fine of 5<sup>s</sup> for having aid to levy the aforesaid 10<sup>s</sup> from the aforesaid John.<ref>{{:Lister, John 1930a}}, p. 80.</ref>}}</onlyinclude> | ||
== Source notes == | == Source notes == | ||
Wakefield Manor Court, 9 Edward II, Court held at Halifax, Monday next after the Octave of Easter; under section heading "Sourbi", i.e. Sowerby; membrane 11.<ref>Lister, pp. 77, 78, 79, 80.</ref> Italics and brackets (except date) as in printed source. | Wakefield Manor Court, 9 Edward II, Court held at Halifax, Monday next after the Octave of Easter; under section heading "Sourbi", i.e. Sowerby; membrane 11.<ref>Lister, pp. 77, 78, 79, 80.</ref> Italics and brackets (except date) as in printed source. | ||
Revision as of 12:57, 3 February 2019
| Record | |
|---|---|
| Date | 1316 |
| Topic | Robert and Robert, sons of John Hood, to recover sum from John of Miggeley. |
By Henrik Thiil Nielsen, 2019-03-02. Revised by Henrik Thiil Nielsen, 2019-02-03.
Record
[1316:]
It is found [attinctum] by an Inquisition of the jurors that John of Miggeley by a certain false suggestion which he laid against Robert & Robert [sic] sons of John Hodde unjustly & maliciously recovered against the aforesaid Robert & Robert 10s by a plea in conoscor. It is ordered, therefore, that the aforesaid Robert & Robert recover the aforesaid 10s against the aforesaid John, & that he be amerced 6d, and the aforesaid Robert & Robert pay a fine of 5s for having aid to levy the aforesaid 10s from the aforesaid John.[1]
Source notes
Wakefield Manor Court, 9 Edward II, Court held at Halifax, Monday next after the Octave of Easter; under section heading "Sourbi", i.e. Sowerby; membrane 11.[2] Italics and brackets (except date) as in printed source.
Lists
- Not included in Sussex, Lucy, compil. 'References to Robin Hood up to 1600', in: Knight, Stephen. Robin Hood: A Complete Study of the English Outlaw (Oxford, UK; Cambridge, Massachusetts: Blackwell, 1994), pp. 262-88.
Sources
- Lister, John, ed.; [Stokes, Ethel, transcr.]; [Longbotham, A.T., index.]. Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield. Vol. IV. 1315 to 1317 (Yorkshire Archæological Society, Record Series, vol. LXXVIII) (1930), p. 80, and see pp. 77, 78, 79.
Background
Cross-references
Notes